<HTML><HEAD>
<STYLE id=eMClientCss>
blockquote.cite { margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc }
blockquote.cite2 {margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 0px; }
.plain pre, .plain tt { font-family: monospace; font-size: 100%; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; }
a img { border: 0px; }body {font-family: Tahoma;font-size: 12pt;}
.plain pre, .plain tt {font-family: Tahoma;font-size: 12pt;}</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>Got a customer with a CUSP and both sides seem to be pegging very very high on the cpu usage. So high I believe it is interfering with call processing. The vendor that put this new cluster did not follow best practices in general so there are all kinds of things going on like criss-crossing of media between the two geographically separated sides. My real problem is that the CUSP module is much harder to diagnose than say a regular voice gateway due to a lack of commands to figure out what is pegging the cpu so bad. Anybody have any good ideas? I can say the licensing is woefully inadequate and looks to be based on average CPS and not peak though I don't think that would have an impact on cpu usage.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>thanks</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Brian</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
<br>
<div><font color="gray"><i>The information contained in this electronic transmission
and any attachments hereto may be considered proprietary and confidential. Unauthorized distribution of this material to anyone other than the addressed is
prohibited. Any disclosure, distribution or use of this transmission for any
reason other than their intended purpose is prohibited.</i></font></div>