<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Charles,<br><br>I guess that is a better place to start; I may be going down this road in a near future. I have been reading <a href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8</a> which seems to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.<br><br>Are you saying it is not?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Ryan<br><br><div>> From: wokka@justfamily.org<br>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question<br>> To: ryanhuff@outlook.com<br>> CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> <br>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from<br>> the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running<br>> ios-xe.<br>> <br>> I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in<br>> preparation of deploying these.<br>> <br>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff@outlook.com> wrote:<br>> > I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the ccm<br>> > facing side and the itsp facing side.<br>> ><br>> > 1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of cube-ha<br>> > anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion?<br>> ><br>> > 2.) If I include the connected call failover, which side would I do that<br>> > one, 1 or both (ccm facing side or itsp facing side)?<br>> ><br>> > Thanks,<br>> ><br>> > Ryan<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br></div> </div></body>
</html>