<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I haven't seen messaging licenses change for a device in cucm yet ... Now will need to look closer.</div><div><br></div><div>But I have seen CER licenses decrease when a owner is set same on multiple devices in cucm . Still need to dig into that to get understanding of why...</div><div><br></div><div>Up until i saw that, I thought each product type license was not tied to other types. Have not found much in docs yet on this.</div><div><br></div><div><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Huff <<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">Had a healthy, licensed 5 node cluster. Some Telepresence units were added and that put the PLM out of compliance, clearly. So the TP licenses were added (using the built in auto-pak fill tool)and that brought the TP license shortage back into compliance BUT put basic messaging, essential and enhanced licensing out of compliance.<br><br>My question is, once TP units are configured in CUCM, does that change the geometry of existing licensed users?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Ryan<br><br> </div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br><span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>