<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Variphy Insight has the ability to remotely control endpoints. Furthermore you can perform Text Broadcast w Reply capabilities from the phones. Variphy will also allow you to run macros on those remote phones which will allow you to edit phone settings (delete ITL files, etc. in bulk remotely).<br><br>Dan <br><br><br><div>> From: cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 144, Issue 27<br>> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:00:04 -0400<br>> <br>> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> <br>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net<br>> <br>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net<br>> <br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."<br>> <br>> <br>> Today's Topics:<br>> <br>> 1. I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise<br>> number mask (Barnett, Nick)<br>> 2. Whisper Coaching for CCX (Matthew Loraditch)<br>> 3. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise<br>> number mask (Scott Voll)<br>> 4. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)<br>> 5. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise<br>> number mask (Barnett, Nick)<br>> 6. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise<br>> number mask (Ryan Ratliff (rratliff))<br>> 7. CME 9.1 shared line (Jeremy Rogers (AM))<br>> 8. Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Scott Voll)<br>> 9. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Walenta, Philip)<br>> 10. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Stephen Welsh)<br>> 11. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Charles Goldsmith)<br>> 12. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Nick Britt)<br>> 13. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)<br>> 14. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Jason Aarons (AM))<br>> 15. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)<br>> 16. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)<br>> 17. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)<br>> 18. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Ryan Huff)<br>> 19. Caller ID (Lisa Notarianni)<br>> 20. Re: Caller ID (Matthew Loraditch)<br>> 21. Cisco hardware with built-in echo service (Sevana Oy)<br>> 22. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Terry Oakley)<br>> <br>> <br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:35:26 +0000<br>> From: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate<br>> enterprise number mask<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <52587669999449b0aeddde69c4833249@C1EML154.corp.alliance.lan><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> Here's the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.<br>> <br>> I'm aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I'll get there, I just can't do it right now.<br>> <br>> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished... I think.<br>> <br>> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I'm slightly worried that it could raise processor usage... but I'm mostly just worried about it because it is "new" to me.<br>> <br>> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Nick<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/6d85b6b6/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 2<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:38 +0000<br>> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Whisper Coaching for CCX<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E29835AFC55C9@PHANES.helion.local><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> I know this isn't built in..<br>> I read that Compliance Recording has it but am having problems confirming.<br>> Any other solutions?<br>> <br>> <br>> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA<br>> Network Engineer<br>> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518<br>> <br>> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> | G+<https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts><br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/bfcaed9b/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:09:23 -0700<br>> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> To: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate<br>> enterprise number mask<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAHgd+39XoahixKsfzMbEO-MuXvw3_k9o6crtuxcQSh2K08w2FQ@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to<br>> 130xxxxxxx.<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <<br>> Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our<br>> > field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to<br>> > the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting<br>> > speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This<br>> > causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount<br>> > of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing<br>> > 9 to reach HQ for decades.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with<br>> > non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just<br>> > can?t do it right now.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use<br>> > 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a<br>> > derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission<br>> > accomplished? I think.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried<br>> > that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it<br>> > because it is ?new? to me.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Thanks,<br>> ><br>> > Nick<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/fea8e292/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 4<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:13:40 -0500<br>> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAGm7T+CmEuD3Us_z39E=yLrCyg2q3RX=K9Wvio=yLBg-b1c9Og@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I concur with Ryan, linux is the way to go. If you are trying to get<br>> backups to an offsite location or to a backup device, it can be a bit more<br>> challenging, but it can be done. I use shell scripts to copy the files<br>> where I need them to go once the backups are complete from the UC apps.<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and<br>> > FTP?<br>> ><br>> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have<br>> > to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> ><br>> > What have others had good success using?<br>> ><br>> > Thanks<br>> ><br>> > Scott<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/79b0e796/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 5<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:16:36 +0000<br>> From: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate<br>> enterprise number mask<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <417a4a4ee2d044d899f2fac011612976@C1EML154.corp.alliance.lan><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of translations going on.<br>> <br>> From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com]<br>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM<br>> To: Barnett, Nick<br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask<br>> <br>> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to 130xxxxxxx.<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com>> wrote:<br>> Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.<br>> <br>> I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just can?t do it right now.<br>> <br>> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished? I think.<br>> <br>> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it because it is ?new? to me.<br>> <br>> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Nick<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=BQMFaQ&c=M-KQspD_LQogCbR-BWCHOaeDEPOhF8vWqHZTaiwxT3c&r=T9uVLZucbHG2NKKKzOrp-o5cpdReHj02PkJJsCVkgfwcv7S0R5lDeFJg2VRbiNih&m=paRhBsPV9F8cx4V4Suj3w3w0oN2AL6Vk-F2aL89dfXU&s=v-bYzIVjb_NyIJNhPSXZZCGYMsLM0Q2Bzdh64sFwJFE&e=><br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/81d57d65/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 6<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:07:14 +0000<br>> From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff@cisco.com><br>> To: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com><br>> Cc: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate<br>> enterprise number mask<br>> Message-ID: <97BAC97A-5BC9-4EFF-8D08-8ECD69325A9B@cisco.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I think this is a great use for the alternate enterprise number and it won?t cause any overhead with call processing.<br>> <br>> -Ryan<br>> <br>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com>> wrote:<br>> <br>> I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of translations going on.<br>> <br>> From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com]<br>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM<br>> To: Barnett, Nick<br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask<br>> <br>> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to 130xxxxxxx.<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett@countryfinancial.com>> wrote:<br>> Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.<br>> <br>> I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just can?t do it right now.<br>> <br>> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished? I think.<br>> <br>> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it because it is ?new? to me.<br>> <br>> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Nick<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=BQMFaQ&c=M-KQspD_LQogCbR-BWCHOaeDEPOhF8vWqHZTaiwxT3c&r=T9uVLZucbHG2NKKKzOrp-o5cpdReHj02PkJJsCVkgfwcv7S0R5lDeFJg2VRbiNih&m=paRhBsPV9F8cx4V4Suj3w3w0oN2AL6Vk-F2aL89dfXU&s=v-bYzIVjb_NyIJNhPSXZZCGYMsLM0Q2Bzdh64sFwJFE&e=><br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/94472437/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 7<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:36:18 +0000<br>> From: "Jeremy Rogers (AM)" <jeremy.rogers@dimensiondata.com><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CME 9.1 shared line<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <12653A76E0C67C4DA0C8CE32C504C4EC1F7C7D6B@usispsvexdb03.na.didata.local><br>> <br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<br>> <br>> I have a CME with several 9971 phones that have a shared line. Internally they use a 3 digit extension. Externally the calls hit an inbound translation to go from a 10 digit DID to the 3 digit extension. The issue is as follows:<br>> <br>> If I call from a cell phone to the DID, the call only rings on the SIP phone that has that DN as line 1.<br>> If I call internally to the 3 digit DN, it rings on all three phones.<br>> <br>> Is this normal behavior? I've tried searching but can't find any answers.<br>> <br>> Jeremy Rogers CCNA<br>> Advanced Technical consultant<br>> Advanced Solutions, Professional Services<br>> Dimension Data<br>> Office: +1.732.452.5238<br>> Mobile: +1.908.229.3474<br>> e-fax: +1.732.352.7891<br>> www.dimensiondata.com<http://www.dimensiondata.com/><br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/b5a4c38f/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 8<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:51:25 -0700<br>> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAHgd+39E=nAir51MYd0K5n4UuxgW6_wuYQaXqH9tnxnQLjtvxg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> <br>> Do you like them?<br>> <br>> Pro's and Con's?<br>> <br>> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made<br>> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> <br>> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It<br>> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a<br>> little xp'ish).<br>> <br>> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> <br>> TIA<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/9c24e9c3/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 9<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:54:22 -0700<br>> From: "Walenta, Philip" <Philip.Walenta@Polycom.com><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <77CC199279E5D6428BD080E49D52C8B2A1B99AE876@CRPMBOXPRD08.polycom.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I?ve been using Unified FX for quite some time now. The ability to see/manage groups of phones makes it a dream for me (I manage several labs, so I have a different use case).<br>> <br>> It makes certain tasks very easy (like putting wallpapers on phones). You can also use it to monitor audio and send audio (Play:AreYouThere.raw) etc.<br>> <br>> The interface is a little sparse, but very functional.<br>> <br>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll<br>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 4:51 PM<br>> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> <br>> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> <br>> Do you like them?<br>> <br>> Pro's and Con's?<br>> <br>> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> <br>> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).<br>> <br>> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> <br>> TIA<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/feec8337/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 10<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:12:54 +0000<br>> From: Stephen Welsh <stephen.welsh@unifiedfx.com><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID: <AA216EC6-C577-4985-B1B5-59E5C1D33A78@unifiedfx.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Okay, I can?t resit this one ;)<br>> <br>> I?m sure opinions will vary based on personal taste etc., but one key point, only PhoneView (http://www.unifiedfx.com) is Cisco Compatible (tested with 10.5, IVT testing for 11.0 will be complete shortly too) and used by Cisco themselves including the following:<br>> <br>> Cisco ACE team (internal Cisco IT that supports alpha clusters etc.)<br>> CCIE Collaboration Proctors to help remotely mark your pod configuration<br>> Cisco Devnet sandbox<br>> Cisco TAC globally<br>> <br>> I?m not claiming our software is flawless, but it is being used to manage Millions of IP Phones, so we do have a few happy customers ;)<br>> <br>> Kind Regards<br>> <br>> Stephen Welsh<br>> CTO<br>> UnifiedFX<br>> <br>> On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:51, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com>> wrote:<br>> <br>> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> <br>> Do you like them?<br>> <br>> Pro's and Con's?<br>> <br>> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> <br>> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).<br>> <br>> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> <br>> TIA<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/af505b2c/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 11<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:41:55 -0500<br>> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAGm7T+AShp_oD9yuireQTbWzYJm5NLu5Se3DzYkdw39E4WNVCg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> ><br>> > Do you like them?<br>> ><br>> > Pro's and Con's?<br>> ><br>> > We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made<br>> > their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> ><br>> > We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It<br>> > seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a<br>> > little xp'ish).<br>> ><br>> > Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> ><br>> > TIA<br>> ><br>> > Scott<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/5dbb5cea/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 12<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:55:03 +1100<br>> From: Nick Britt <nickolasjbritt@gmail.com><br>> To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> Cc: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAKsS23+B3e00hQYRrEyPP8TFiknPFv_BTUwfC98mxnLZOdXzBg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> +1 plus for unified fx saved my bacon numerous times ;-)<br>> <br>> On Friday, 30 October 2015, Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org> wrote:<br>> <br>> > Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.<br>> ><br>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com<br>> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','svoll.voip@gmail.com');>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> >> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> >><br>> >> Do you like them?<br>> >><br>> >> Pro's and Con's?<br>> >><br>> >> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made<br>> >> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> >><br>> >> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It<br>> >> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a<br>> >> little xp'ish).<br>> >><br>> >> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> >><br>> >> TIA<br>> >><br>> >> Scott<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');><br>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> >><br>> >><br>> ><br>> <br>> -- <br>> - Nick<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/40bd5065/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 13<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:36:13 -0400<br>> From: Mike King <me@mpking.com><br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CANtPpk4zsBbap9gV2N713Zioo5k4GxLU9MBQMibkeLZa9duFfg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> <br>> Mike<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and<br>> > FTP?<br>> ><br>> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have<br>> > to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> ><br>> > What have others had good success using?<br>> ><br>> > Thanks<br>> ><br>> > Scott<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/1b6ff02d/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 14<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:54:40 +0000<br>> From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com><br>> To: Mike King <me@mpking.com>, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <2EB6888CFB98614EA7384BEB9AF8B3821F88BB84@usispsvexdb03.na.didata.local><br>> <br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.<br>> <br>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike King<br>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM<br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> <br>> <br>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> <br>> Mike<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com>> wrote:<br>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?<br>> <br>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> <br>> What have others had good success using?<br>> <br>> Thanks<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> itevomcid<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/dc62a6be/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 15<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:30:37 -0500<br>> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com><br>> Cc: Mike King <me@mpking.com>, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com>,<br>> "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAGm7T+CC=ZyrMoCk10xQbi7yc9wOjozj9brcyhMycYwfuJvECQ@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i<br>> know about<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <<br>> jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf<br>> > Of *Mike King<br>> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM<br>> > *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Mike<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and<br>> > FTP?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have<br>> > to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > What have others had good success using?<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Thanks<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Scott<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > itevomcid<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > cisco-voip mailing list<br>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/96805420/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 16<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:34:36 -0400<br>> From: Mike King <me@mpking.com><br>> To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> Cc: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com>, Scott Voll<br>> <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CANtPpk70j2zuAJ4j5p-rSROPggqMbAJyqbSAMHsXBoAQa+vRAQ@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> wrote:<br>> <br>> > same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i<br>> > know about<br>> ><br>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <<br>> > jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com> wrote:<br>> ><br>> >> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On<br>> >> Behalf Of *Mike King<br>> >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM<br>> >> *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> >> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> Mike<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> >> wrote:<br>> >><br>> >> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and<br>> >> FTP?<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have<br>> >> to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> What have others had good success using?<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> Thanks<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> Scott<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> itevomcid<br>> >><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> >><br>> >><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/99dbe6b7/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 17<br>> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:44:03 -0500<br>> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> To: Mike King <me@mpking.com><br>> Cc: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com>, Scott Voll<br>> <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAGm7T+B-30QXsGziz9DdPxAjke6x3a92Pp2KQ+qY6gKKewb2Jg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I don't think this is technically SFTP as we know it in the Cisco world.<br>> This is FTP-SSL/TLS. I have not tested it, but I don't think we can use it<br>> to backup our UC apps.<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Mike King <me@mpking.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> ><br>> > http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html<br>> ><br>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org><br>> > wrote:<br>> ><br>> >> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i<br>> >> know about<br>> >><br>> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <<br>> >> jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com> wrote:<br>> >><br>> >>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On<br>> >>> Behalf Of *Mike King<br>> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM<br>> >>> *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> >>> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> Mike<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com><br>> >>> wrote:<br>> >>><br>> >>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP<br>> >>> and FTP?<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have<br>> >>> to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> What have others had good success using?<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> Thanks<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> Scott<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> _______________________________________________<br>> >>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >>> itevomcid<br>> >>><br>> >>> _______________________________________________<br>> >>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/f650f5ce/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 18<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 01:48:09 +0000<br>> From: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff@outlook.com><br>> To: Mike King <me@mpking.com><br>> Cc: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org>,<br>> "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <BY1PR18MB012025E4D243B787BCA4E551C52F0@BY1PR18MB0120.namprd18.prod.outlook.com><br>> <br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> It is worth noting that SFTP and FTPS are completely different protocols.<br>> <br>> FTPS is FTP with a control channel and opens new connections for the data transfer. As it uses SSL, it requires a certificate.<br>> <br>> SFTP is an extension of SSH, so it usually uses only the SSH port for both data and control.<br>> <br>> SSH server installations generally have SFTP support but FTPS typically needs a supported FTP server.<br>> <br>> Sent from my iPad<br>> <br>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Mike King <me@mpking.com<mailto:me@mpking.com>> wrote:<br>> <br>> http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org<mailto:wokka@justfamily.org>> wrote:<br>> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i know about<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com<mailto:jason.aarons@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:<br>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server....<br>> <br>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Mike King<br>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM<br>> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com>><br>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?<br>> <br>> <br>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.<br>> <br>> Mike<br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip@gmail.com>> wrote:<br>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?<br>> <br>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to restart it and run my backups again.<br>> <br>> What have others had good success using?<br>> <br>> Thanks<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> itevomcid<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/ef754b17/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 19<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:28:33 +0000<br>> From: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni@scranton.edu><br>> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID<br>> Message-ID: <4D3DBFF0-5C03-46F0-A964-670A4468446C@scranton.edu><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> In Call Manager ver 10.5, is there any way when a call comes in through a PRI (outside of the network) to a DID and then forwards to a Remote Destination configuration to pass the caller ID along instead of the default number associated with the PRI?<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 20<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:46:01 +0000<br>> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch@heliontechnologies.com><br>> To: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni@scranton.edu>,<br>> "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E29835AFC705A@PHANES.helion.local><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> It depends on where you are programming the outbound Caller ID. The redirecting CSS is the path used to get to the mobile so as long as nothing in that path sets the ID it will pass through.<br>> We use to program the CID directly on the MGCP PRI configs in CUCM. With mobility we moved it to the route patterns and then set up a separate set of partitions/rps just for mobility calls that didn't force the CID.<br>> <br>> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA<br>> Network Engineer<br>> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518<br>> <br>> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+<br>> <br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lisa Notarianni<br>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 7:29 AM<br>> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID<br>> <br>> In Call Manager ver 10.5, is there any way when a call comes in through a PRI (outside of the network) to a DID and then forwards to a Remote Destination configuration to pass the caller ID along instead of the default number associated with the PRI?<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 21<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:01:15 +0200<br>> From: Sevana Oy <sales@sevana.fi><br>> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco hardware with built-in echo service<br>> Message-ID: <5c054876dddd3a05040695cad86acadd@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>> <br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> I heard there are Cisco phones with built-in echo service, do you know any<br>> by chance?<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Amanda @ Sevana<br>> http://sevana.biz<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 22<br>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:06:53 -0600<br>> From: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley@rdc.ab.ca><br>> To: 'Scott Voll' <svoll.voip@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"<br>> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <C53F9D4DA50C854F90C655DBBC63D40C152EE0C5F6@RDCEXMAIL1.RDCSRVCS.ADS><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> I add to the UnifiedFX solution for remote phone control. We still are a strong Singlewire shop with their InformaCast product for notification, both informational and emergency. With the drop in support of the RemotePhone software it was very nice to find the UnifiedFX solution. Very happy with the results and they just keep adding to the offering so that even makes it better.<br>> <br>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll<br>> Sent: October 29, 2015 3:51 PM<br>> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions<br>> <br>> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?<br>> <br>> Do you like them?<br>> <br>> Pro's and Con's?<br>> <br>> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.<br>> <br>> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).<br>> <br>> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.<br>> <br>> TIA<br>> <br>> Scott<br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/cba05d53/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Subject: Digest Footer<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> cisco-voip mailing list<br>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 144, Issue 27<br>> *******************************************<br></div> </div></body>
</html>