<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Looks like anything under the “Unified Communications” umbrella could have been affected. You can call off the black helicopters :)
<div class=""><br class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">-Ryan </div>
<br class="">
<div>
<div class="">On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Ryan Huff <<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com" class="">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">It makes more sense that was a snafu or some sort of a planned maintenance. It is odd though, that it seemed to only selectively impact some of the collaboration images, specifically those that are going the cloud, and that it happened the weekend
before the summit. I dont recall seeing a maintenance notice.<br class="">
<br class="">
-------- Original message --------<br class="">
From: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman@gmail.com class=""><br class="">
Date:12/07/2015 9:52 AM (GMT-05:00) <br class="">
To: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff@outlook.com class=""><br class="">
Cc: Charles Goldsmith <wokka@justfamily.org class="">,<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>
<br class="">
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Did Cisco Remove all voice downloads from <a href="http://cisco.com" class="">
Cisco.com</a>? <br class="">
<br class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">This sounds ominous !
<div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Huff <span dir="ltr" class="">
<<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com" target="_blank" class="">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class="">Hold your ISO's tight!!!! </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I am withholding judgment and opinion till after the collaboration summit and Rowan & Jonathan have a chance to lay the plan out. Some of the pre released stuff looks interesting though ...<br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I would theorize, and especially in the case of an active sntc, a call to TAC would get you what you need, for the time being anyway. I haven't tested that theory mind you, but I just don't see Cisco turning off the firehose mid-stream without
warning and saying, "too bad so sad".</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">-Ryan</div>
<span class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</wokka@justfamily.org></ryanhuff@outlook.com></ealeatherman@gmail.com></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
cisco-voip mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br class="">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>