<div dir="ltr">Why is there still not a COP file for <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">CSCux33949? This has been a known issue for so long it should not be left up to customers to try the 11.0, run into a bug, and then open a TAC case. The BU has known about this for so long, please release a COP file or SU to fix this so this doesn't keep happening to customers.</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:akramadh@cisco.com" target="_blank">akramadh@cisco.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>Hi Ryan, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For CSCux33949: this is always encountered with enhanced license, but if you have premium then the trigger for this is not very common. The original design for LD was such that the SubsystemRouteAndQueue is responsible for sending heartbeats to the JMS
topics (where the LD streams are published). However, with Enhanced license this subsystem is disabled; and hence this issue is triggered every time. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The change in design is that the heartbeat responsibility is now moved to the RmCm subsystem which is present in all license packages. This fix is now available in 11.0(1).ES5, so the recommendation would be to install that so that the latest bug fixes
and the design changes are covered. If you have any other defects that are affecting your deployment, feel free to unicast and I can take a look. Thanks.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Regards,</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Abhiram Kramadhati</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU</font></font></div>
<div>CCIE Collaboration # 40065</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span>
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>cisco-voip <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>> on behalf of Ryan Huff <<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com" target="_blank">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 11:44 AM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>cisco voip <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[cisco-voip] UCCX 11.0.1 bug watch<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hello CC brothers and sisters,</p>
<p>A bit back I emailed in regarding <a href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCup71611" target="_blank">
CSCup71611</a> which is a bug that in some instances, prevents creating an initial Call Control group after a new install / upgrade. It has been proven that this bug is not a 100% hit every time but does exist in the 11.0.1 code base (I hit it in 11.0.1), although
previously thought to have been corrected in the 10.6.x base.</p>
<p>Yesterday, I also hit <a href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux33949" target="_blank">
CSCux33949</a> in the 11.0.1 code base which impacts the Socket.IO service and creates intermittent session timeouts in the LiveData service. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, our own Anthony Holloway has mentioned this bug before. The TAC agent I worked with
stated that <a href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux33949" target="_blank">CSCux33949</a> is a 100% hit every install (but I am not completely sure that is correct).<br>
</p>
<p>In both cases, the latter being the more involved of the two, it took rooting the box and either messing with PKIDs or uploading jar files to fix code (I also fully realize that I signed my own death warrant by deploying 11.0.1 over the much more mature
and stable 10.6(1)SU2).</p>
<p>Just thought I would bump this back to the top, in case anyone is considering a UCCX11.0.1 deployment anytime soon.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ryan<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></span>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>