<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>That's what I get for not reading more closely ;)<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Ovidiu Popa <<a href="mailto:ovi.popa@gmail.com">ovi.popa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">For it to be an SU it should have the last three digits in the range 900-999.
<div>It's an ES :</div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="font-size:12.8px">
<div dir="ltr">(zzz) FCS:000, ES: 001-899, SU: 900-999</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ryan Huff <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com" target="_blank">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div>So I imagine it is SU4 ... I was just wondering why it is not listed on CCO. There have been times, where a new release is listed but then removed due to deferment.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Ovidiu Popa <<a href="mailto:ovi.popa@gmail.com" target="_blank">ovi.popa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hello
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I found this in an old Cisco live presentation. HTH</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>Numbering Convention Example</div>
<div>(A.B.C.XYzzz-x)</div>
<div>(A) Major version (License)</div>
<div>8.6.2.20000-2</div>
<div>(B) Minor version (Long Life Release)</div>
<div>8.6.2.20000-2</div>
<div>(C) Maintenance release(Patch and/or Features)</div>
<div>8.6.2.20000-2</div>
<div>(X) Build (Patch)</div>
<div>8.6.2.10000-2</div>
<div>8.6.2.20000-2</div>
<div>(Y) FCS:0, ESor SU: 1-9</div>
<div>8.6.2.10000-30 (FCS)</div>
<div>8.6.2.22900-1 (ESor SU look at last three digits)</div>
<div>(zzz) FCS:000, ES: 001-899, SU: 900-999</div>
<div>8.6.2.20000-2 (FCS)</div>
<div>8.6.2.21001-1 (ES)</div>
<div>8.6.2.22900-1 (SU)</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div>Ovidiu</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ryan Huff <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:ryanhuff@outlook.com" target="_blank">ryanhuff@outlook.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>Just spotted <span>10.5.2.14060-1</span> on a cluster ... CCO only shows up to
<span>10.5.2.13901-2</span> ( 10.5(2)SU3a ). Anyone know if <span>10.5.2.14060-1 is a deferment or an engineering special ... etc?</span></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Ryan<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>