<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
The 8800s are the only bluetooth endpoints that support wideband audio.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I wouldn’t bother using bluetooth on anything else unless you are a g729 shop or in general don't care about audio quality.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div class="">-Ryan </div>
<br class="">
<div>
<div class="">On Jan 30, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Ed Leatherman <<a href="mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com" class="">ealeatherman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">We've been using the speak 510's for just this reason and they've worked out OK.. actually started using them with 8945's initially but bluetooth seems to work better on the 8800's, anecdotally.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I haven't been thrilled with the 8831. Internal customers don't care for the form-factor and they haven't been as reliable as the 7937's for us.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Pawlowski, Adam <span dir="ltr" class="">
<<a href="mailto:ajp26@buffalo.edu" target="_blank" class="">ajp26@buffalo.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Has anyone tried to use the Cisco 8851 and a Bluetooth speakerphone as sort of a poor man's conferencing set? The sets themselves sound pretty good on their own, but, something like the Jabra Speak 510 that is Bluetooth enabled would be a more cost effective
option than the $900+ 8831 set (which still has an unresolved bug causing the Conf button to randomly fail anyways).<br class="">
<br class="">
It is obviously not explicitly called out as supported, but, anyone tried this and had any success? Or, any recommendation on a 3rd party conferencing phone that is more cost effective, even if not as capable, for a smaller (6 - 8 person) conference?<br class="">
<br class="">
Regards,<br class="">
<br class="">
Adam Pawlowski<br class="">
SUNYAB NCS<br class="">
<a href="mailto:ajp26@buffalo.edu" class="">ajp26@buffalo.edu</a><br class="">
<a href="tel:%2B1.716.6458489" value="+17166458489" class="">+1.716.6458489</a><br class="">
______________________________<wbr class="">_________________<br class="">
cisco-voip mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br class="">
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://puck.nether.net/<wbr class="">mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br class="">
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
<br clear="all" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
-- <br class="">
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Ed Leatherman<br class="">
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
cisco-voip mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br class="">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>