<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
Reto,<br>
<br>
<div>Seek/rpm speeds and media type (flash, sata ... etc) are usually what matter the most for RAID disks. If your only difference is total storage capacity, the bigger disk will usually work just fine, your just gonna waste the additional 154GB of space (because
the RAID will only provision 146GB of that 300GB disk).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Just remember on a RAID 5, don’t pull/lose more that 1 disk at a time .... painful lesson long ago I share over beer every now and then.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Ryan</div>
<div><br>
On Nov 14, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Reto Gassmann <<a href="mailto:voip@mrga.ch">voip@mrga.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="auto">Hallo </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">We have a UCS C210 Server with 10x146 GB Disks. One of the Disks failed and I got a 300 GB replacement Disk from Cisco.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Is that a problem if I replace the defect 146 Disk in the RAID 5 with a 300 GB Disk?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Thanks for help</div>
<div dir="auto">Regards Reto</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>