<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Two things I can think of to investigate.
<div class="">1. EEE settings on the phones (especially if they are on old software). This caused tons of problems with PCs a while back and may be coming into play here.</div>
<div class="">2. Automatic Port Synchronization - This setting forces the PC port to the same speed as the Switch port, so if your switch is 1000/Full and the Zero client doesn’t agree this could cause issues.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Given Mike’s reply about forcing them to 100/Full I’m guessing the 2nd setting could be coming into play.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">-Ryan </div>
<div><br class="">
<div class="">On Dec 13, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Mike King <<a href="mailto:me@mpking.com" class="">me@mpking.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">We have some Teradici Zero Clients, and began to have issues with them last year. We ended up hard coding them to 100/Full, and our issues went away.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">We did have a different use case, as we were having the zero clients at the end of runs, not plugged into a device with what has to be less than a 14 foot cord. So I don't know. We were attributing it to some kind of attenuation on the cable
plant (We didn't own the cable plant, nor did we have test results of it), and dropping to 100/Full cleared it up so we stopped investigating. We only had about 5 of the devices, and they are extremely static, so it wasn't worth the effort to investigate
further.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Nathan Reeves <span dir="ltr" class="">
<<a href="mailto:nathan.a.reeves@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">nathan.a.reeves@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr" class="">Interested to know if anyone's seen issues when connecting Teradici Zero Clients through the switchport on Cisco Phones. In this case 8845 and 7841 phones.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Customer is moving to CUCM and has an established base of Zero Clients. They're starting to see packet loss reported on their clients only when connected to the network via the phones. Not previously noted packet loss with their previous IP
Phone (Siemens).</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Anyone know of any best practices / issues with this setup?</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Thanks</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Nathan</div>
</font></span></div>
<br class="">
______________________________<wbr class="">_________________<br class="">
cisco-voip mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br class="">
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://puck.nether.net/<wbr class="">mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br class="">
<br class="">
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
cisco-voip mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" class="">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br class="">
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>