<div dir="ltr">That seems to be it Bill. Now, since I was looking for documentation to support my theory that it's not supported, I do read that in my favor (confirmation bias). Does anyone else care to share their perspective on what that passage might actually not be saying?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM Bill Talley <<a href="mailto:btalley@gmail.com">btalley@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Not sure if the screenshot came through... another attempt.</div><div><br></div><img src="cid:ii_jbh7v8jm1_1607bc2f8f1a95d0" width="562" height="290"><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Bill Talley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:btalley@gmail.com" target="_blank">btalley@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">How about this? It's the closest I've seen to what you're asking about.<div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmsys/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100_chapter_010001.html#CUCM_RF_S05975F9_00" target="_blank">https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmsys/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100_chapter_010001.html#CUCM_RF_S05975F9_00</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><img width="643" height="333" style="margin-right:0px"><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="m_-6353148361137408418HOEnZb"><div class="m_-6353148361137408418h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Anthony Holloway <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com" target="_blank">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">No unfortunately, just gotta play the cards dealt on this one.<div><br></div><div>Actually, I'm not interested in changing anything, I'm looking for documentation that supports what these two Cisco employee have publicly stated. I personally will only cite sources from official documentation, and not from web forums, regardless of who posted it. Because, at the end of the day, that employee can be wrong, and Cisco does not have to take responsibility for the infraction. However, in documentation they do. Either they fix the documentation, or they fix the technology.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:00 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div><br>
</div>
<div id="m_-6353148361137408418m_6890067289995263953m_1273656118427084364m_2721435418735699819AppleMailSignature">Looks like the thread points you to sccp controlled fxs ports. I'm sure you have your reasons for wanting MGCP. Curious what those are. </div>
<div id="m_-6353148361137408418m_6890067289995263953m_1273656118427084364m_2721435418735699819AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="m_-6353148361137408418m_6890067289995263953m_1273656118427084364m_2721435418735699819AppleMailSignature">Could you get away with ATAs?<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div></div><span><div dir="auto">
<div><br>
On Dec 16, 2017, at 1:50 AM, Anthony Holloway <<a href="mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com" target="_blank">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Does anyone have current information on whether or not MGCP FXS ports can be on shared lines with Cisco IP Phones?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No anecdotal or empirical evidence please. I'm looking for documented facts, preferably the kind that doesn't require re-reading it like 10 times to come up with your own interpretation.<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Check out what the two Cisco Employees are saying in this thread from 2010 (Spoiler - It's not supported)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony/shared-line-between-ip-phones-and-fxs-port-with-sccp-setup/td-p/1045431" target="_blank">https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony/shared-line-between-ip-phones-and-fxs-port-with-sccp-setup/td-p/1045431</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Are you a Cisco employee who likes to stick your neck out for internet strangers, and also believe this to be unsupported? Please contact me. Or not. I'm not crying.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div><div dir="auto"><blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</span></blockquote></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>