<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Yikes.. it was menu driven..<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I put my first one in and it had 48 x faxes on it…<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">48 faxes that all seemed to have different volume levels which couldn’t be adjusted on the fax, and it caused transmission errors..<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So about 200 x Telstra FOLDS tests later – and manually adjusting the gain on each port via the menu.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Prefer IOS <span style="font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"">😊</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 2:07 pm<br>
<b>To: </b>NateCCIE <nateccie@gmail.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Apparently I have been living under a rock for 13 years. I didn't know the VG248 wasn't IOS based, because, well, I've never worked with one. So, what is it then?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:03 PM NateCCIE <<a href="mailto:nateccie@gmail.com">nateccie@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">VG248 was the best one ever made by Cisco. Not IOS based made the thing<br>
super stable and easy to configure/manage. Makes me sad when ever I think<br>
about it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: cisco-voip <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>> On Behalf Of Lelio<br>
Fulgenzi<br>
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:35 PM<br>
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>)<br>
<<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules<br>
<br>
<br>
I see the VG350 has pretty much been EOL'd (February 29, 2024) in favour of<br>
ISR4K with high density voice service modules or a VG450 (which is ISR4K<br>
based).<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html" target="_blank">https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-<br>
series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html</a><br>
<br>
Anybody know if the VG310 and VG320 is going that path? It would be hard to<br>
assume so, since the VG400s are very low density and look like they're<br>
replacing the VG202/VG204.<br>
<br>
I can't imagine having to fork out for a ISR4K for 24 or 48 analog ports.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst<br>
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph<br>
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G<br>
2W1<br>
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | <a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs" target="_blank">www.uoguelph.ca/ccs</a><<a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs" target="_blank">http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs</a>> | @UofGCCS on Instagram,<br>
Twitter and Facebook<br>
<br>
[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>