<div dir="ltr">You mentioned Primary Phone, so I thought I understood you, but I guess not.<div><br></div><div><i>"If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where <b>a primary phone is not set</b>, more licenses are used then would need to be."</i></div><div><br></div><div>The primary phone field does not play a role in licensing anymore. It's simply the owner user id set on the phone.</div><div><br></div><div>As for the workings of UCL:</div><div><br></div><div><div>
1 device (regardless of user association) = 1 enhanced* </div><div>2 devices with 1 user = 1 enhanced plus <br></div><div>3 - 10 devices all with 1 owner user id = 1 cuwl</div><div></div><div></div><div>11+ devices all with 1 owner user id = 1+ cuwl (e.g., 34 devices + 1 user = 4 cuwl) <br></div><div><br></div><div>*unless you purchased a cheap phone, then it might be basic or essential</div></div><div><br></div><div>Don't forget the borrowing that happens, so technically, a single device with no user could consume a cuwl license.</div><div><br></div><div>E.g., Anthony with no physical phone but does have: CSF + BOT + TAB + TCT will consume 1 cuwl license, with no primary phone set, just the owner user id on all 4 devices.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:13 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_190264171833736124WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Yes, no DLUs, but there’s still licenses. So, what I was afraid of was that instead of one CUWL license, it would use 4 separate enhanced licenses. But, I’m guessing because it’s all one userID, it uses the license based on the number of
devices.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, if I have 4 Jabber devices to one userID, it uses CUWL, but if it uses 2 jabber devices, it uses enhanced?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Anthony Holloway <<a href="mailto:avholloway%2Bcisco-voip@gmail.com" target="_blank">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, January 13, 2020 2:39 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> voyp list, cisco-voip (<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>) <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] setting primary phone for Jabber users without a physical phone - licensing<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have *not* had DLUs since...<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:38 PM Anthony Holloway <<a href="mailto:avholloway%2Bcisco-voip@gmail.com" target="_blank">avholloway+cisco-voip@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I might be saying something completely crazy here, but the Primary Phone field does nothing for you ever since CUCM 9x User Connect Licenses (UCL).<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here's what the help says for that field:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i>Choose the physical phone that will be associated with the application, such as IP communicator or Cisco Unified Personal Communicator. When you choose a primary phone, the application
<b>consumes fewer device license units</b> and is considered an "adjunct" license (to the primary phone).</i><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have had DLUs since 8x, so, unless you're on version 8.x, you can ignore this field.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
I'm trying to setup an easy to replicate (troubleshoot/reconcile) system in place for our Jabber deployment.<br>
<br>
We've decided to assign each Jabber device type to each user so there's no end-user support issues when they want to use it on another device and/or move from one device type to another.<br>
<br>
If I'm not mistaken, in this case, and, in any case where a primary phone is not set, more licenses are used then would need to be. The issue at hand here, is what happens when we deploy Jabber without a physical phone?<br>
<br>
I'm already finding that the quick/add feature really only works when a phone is configured (although I have to work through that). So, I'm wondering, is it worthwhile to configure a "dummy" phone for Jabber users and set the primary phone for all Jabber clients
to this dummy phone? Or should I ask them to pick the CSF jabber device as the primary phone for example?<br>
<br>
What have others done?<br>
<br>
Lelio<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>