<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>We’ve been on be7h hardware for years without an issue. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If Cisco had appliance level shared storage I’d be on board. But at last check, it was all still specs.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Mar 22, 2022, at 3:12 AM, James Buchanan <james.buchanan2@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<p></p>
<div style="background-color:#FFEB9C; width:100%; border-style: solid; border-color:#9C6500; border-width:1pt; padding:2pt; font-size:10pt; line-height:12pt; font-family:'Calibri'; color:Black; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-weight:bold;">CAUTION:</span> This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to IThelp@uoguelph.ca</div>
<br>
<p></p>
<div dir="ltr">Totally agree re: both Simplivity and vxRail. No concerns at all at this point. I'd be more concerned running a standalone UCS C-series.</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:37 AM James Andrewartha <<a href="mailto:jandrewartha@ccgs.wa.edu.au">jandrewartha@ccgs.wa.edu.au</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
We're running CUCM/CIMP/CUC on HPE Simplivity, it's been fine so far. <br>
We're a small site (400 phones, one pub/sub for each app) and TAC hasn't <br>
had a problem when I opened a case about CIMP publisher CPU usage (lots <br>
of keytool, disabling Cisco Intercluster Sync Agent stopped it, went in <br>
and deleted an old, unused GoDaddy CA from everywhere fixed it).<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
-- <br>
James Andrewartha<br>
Network & Projects Engineer<br>
Christ Church Grammar School<br>
Claremont, Western Australia<br>
Ph. (08) 9442 1757<br>
Mob. 0424 160 877<br>
<br>
On 22/3/22 02:51, Loren Hillukka wrote:<br>
> I know of a few places running Cisco UC (and UCCE) on vxRail, working <br>
> fine. Follow the specs-based guidelines.<br>
> <br>
> Loren<br>
> <br>
>> On Mar 21, 2022, at 12:45 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<a href="mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca" target="_blank">lelio@uoguelph.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> <br>
>><br>
>> Did you check the specs based listing for the versions? Is it local <br>
>> storage or shared storage? Shared storage has specific requirements as <br>
>> well.<br>
>><br>
>> *From:* cisco-voip <<a href="mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>> *On Behalf Of
<br>
>> *Countryman, Edward<br>
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2022 1:20 PM<br>
>> *To:* <a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Cisco UC on Dell VxRail ?<br>
>><br>
>> We’ve the need to move cucm/unity/ER subscriber nodes to a new data <br>
>> center.<br>
>><br>
>> The new DC runs all dell VxRail hyperconverged hardware.<br>
>><br>
>> Anyone aware of any concerns with cisco UC apps running on this hardware?<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-voip mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>cisco-voip mailing list</span><br>
<span>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net</span><br>
<span>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>