[e-nsp] ACL Issue

Clayton Zekelman clayton at MNSi.Net
Tue Jul 22 10:28:41 EDT 2014



I don't have the info myself, but I can get it 
from the person who opened the ticket with 
Extreme when he gets back in the office later 
today.  I do know that multiple MAC addresses 
have leaked from various parts of our network, 
and the times are variable (sometimes in the 
middle of the night, sometimes during the afternoon, etc..)

Torix has given us packet captures which we've 
forwarded to TAC.  TAC said that the ACLs don't 
block all CPU forwarded or generated packets, and 
this is expected behavior, so there is no resolution.

Their suggestion was to put another switch 
between us and Torix, with another ACL in order to filter the traffic....

I suspect they're going to close our ticket at 
this point.    This is a real pain, as we have 10 
of the Summit switches and two Black Diamond 
switches set up in a ring.  Changing to a new 
vendor is expensive and time consuming.


At 09:20 PM 21/07/2014, Changjie wrote:

>Hello Clayton,
>
>I am thinking of the followings:
>
>1/ Can TORIX shared the MAC address(es) which 
>they detected and blocked? Good to have the timetamps as well.
>
>2/ I currently not in my office to access my lab 
>switches. If I am not wrong, we can only count 
>but cannot syslog on both terms?
>allowonlybr0 and denyall
>
>3/ Does the issue happen at certain timing of 
>the day? e.g. lunch hours, off-peak hours, etc
>
>I feel that once we have inputs for Point 1/, we can investigate further.
>e.g. insert a term to explicitly deny this MAC, 
>count it n place as 2nd entry. We can then check 
>with TAC why this MAC doesnt fall into entry denyall
>
>My 2cents worth.
>On 22 Jul, 2014 6:43 am, "Clayton Zekelman" 
><<mailto:clayton at mnsi.net>clayton at mnsi.net> wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>We're running an Extreme Summit X460-24t 
>15.3.2.11 as an edge switch facing Torix 
>(Toronto Internet Exchange - <http://www.torix.net>www.torix.net).
>
>We've been having an issue for quite a while 
>where the Torix switch will shut down our port 
>because we're leaking packets with a MAC address 
>other than the one we've got registered with the exchange.
>
>We have an outbound ACL on the port:
>
>Policy: torix
>entry allowonlybr0 {
>if match all {
>Â  Â  ethernet-source-address 00:22:83:32:d7:19 ;
>}
>then {
>    permit  ;
>}
>}
>entry denyall {
>if match all {
>Â  Â  ethernet-source-address 00:00:00:00:00:00 mask 00:00:00:00:00:00 ;
>}
>then {
>    deny  ;
>}
>}
>
>For some reason, occasionally an ethernet frame 
>with a different source MAC address is leaking through the ACL.
>
>After running it up the chain with Extreme's support, their response is:
>
>
>"the cpu-forwarded and cpu-generated packets are 
>not blocked by an Egress ACL "
>
>
>This basically makes the switch unusable at 
>Torix, as they auto shut your port for 60 
>minutes if you leak any MAC addresses other than the one you've registered.
>
>Anyone have any ideas, or do we just junk all 
>our Extreme switches and start over?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>
>Clayton Zekelman
>Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
>3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
>Windsor, Ontario
>N8W 1H4
>
>tel. <tel:519-985-8410>519-985-8410
>fax. <tel:519-985-8409>519-985-8409 Â  Â  Â  Â
>_______________________________________________
>extreme-nsp mailing list
><mailto:extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net>extreme-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp

---

Clayton Zekelman
Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
Windsor, Ontario
N8W 1H4

tel. 519-985-8410
fax. 519-985-8409        
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/extreme-nsp/attachments/20140722/1ad04dc5/attachment.html>


More information about the extreme-nsp mailing list