[F10-nsp] Multiple ports hanging/dropping on on S50
wwbach at gmail.com
wwbach at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 11:03:46 EST 2010
Thanks again. If anyone else has any further insight on these switches they
want to share, I'd sure appreciate it.
-- Bud
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, David Rodgers <david at davidrodgers.com>wrote:
> Oh ... and one last thing I noticed from your story. These older S50
> switches are really sensitive to continual port bouncing/state changes
> (something that was fixed in later N/V revs) ... way more than any other
> switch that I've used. They don't deal with it well so if you have ports
> that are bouncing up and down quite a bit and/or taking a while to negotiate
> you might want to either check on the cabling or disable them altogether.
>
> David Rodgers
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:35 AM, wwbach at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks David. Is there a new or older version of sftos that you would
> recommend as more stable (assuming I could obtain it). Thanks. -- Bud
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, David Rodgers <david at davidrodgers.com>wrote:
>
>> On that code rev I've experienced similar issues on occasion on certain
>> chassis even with a single switch not stacking ....
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:18 PM, wwbach at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> We've recently picked up three used force10 SA-01-GE-48T switches. We're
>> experiencing random issues where is seems like a significant portion of the
>> switch stack drops connections to the devices connected. This is happening
>> maybe a couple of times a day.
>>
>> Here is some more info:
>>
>> I only know enought to be dangerous -- we have a networking consultant
>> working on it who probably is better with cisco gear but has some f10
>> experience.
>>
>> The swithes are stacked using two stacking cables -- 1 to 2 and 2 to 3.
>> This seems like this is a supported configuration (cascade) according to
>> this web page:
>>
>>
>> http://www.force10networks.com/CSPortal20/TechTips/0057_HowDoIStackSSeriesUnitsTogether.aspx
>>
>> but maybe we *need* a cable from switch 3 back to 1 (ring)?
>>
>> All the switches are running SFTOS 2.5.2.2 with QOS, Multicast, Stacking
>> and Routing.
>>
>> Nothing unusual in the log. A few interfaces going up and down but not
>> really corresponsing to when we are experiencing issues.
>>
>> No errors in "show stack-port diag".
>>
>> We took one of the switches out of the mix and things seemed to be better
>> but not perfect.
>>
>> When the problem occurs, everything comes back to normal after a couple of
>> minutes.
>>
>> There are several vlans configured. One vlan where most of the
>> communication is confined to the vlan has not seemed to have any problems.
>>
>> When the problem occurs, it seems to affect ports on multiple switches in
>> the stack.
>>
>> Spanning tree routing is enabled as is OSPF.
>>
>> Another thing worth mentioning is that the we had some issues configurring
>> multicast routing. We wanted to use sparse mode PIM but couldn't get it
>> working with a cisco router. We ended up getting a multicast proxy working
>> -- not sure what this really means.
>>
>> Most of the gear attached to the stack is either broadcom of intel
>> chipset.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to futher debug this issue or what to look at? Thanks.
>> -- Bud
>> _______________________________________________
>> force10-nsp mailing list
>> force10-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> force10-nsp mailing list
> force10-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/force10-nsp/attachments/20100212/c9f665f1/attachment.html>
More information about the force10-nsp
mailing list