<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style><style type='text/css'>body { font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000}</style></head><body>This was exactly my initial concern. I read on their website that their default CAM profile allowed for 256k routes. But what happens when full routes reach 320k? So i guess it makes sense to gear their dual CAM cards since it allows for larger limits.<BR><BR>Brendan Mannella<BR>TeraSwitch Networks Inc.<BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Jo Rhett" <jrhett@svcolo.com><BR>To: "Brendan Mannella" <bmannella@teraswitch.com><BR>Cc: force10-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:49:05 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York<BR>Subject: Re: [F10-nsp] Thoughts on Force10??<BR><BR>We have several E300s in exactly the same environment but with more <BR>transit providers. We've been very happy with them.<BR><BR>You *must* get v7 software, as the v6 code isn't suitable for BGP <BR>peering. You should use the 320k CAM profile.<BR><BR>If you want IPv6, you'll need to get the dual-CAM cards.<BR><BR>Brendan Mannella wrote:<BR>> I am looking to consolidate my 2 juniper m7i's and Foundry BigIron 4000's into a E300 and was hoping to hear what users thought of thei r equipment, in particular their E series. I would be using it to connect my 3 transit providers speaking BGP and accepting full routes as well as it acting as the gateway router for all of my customer VLANs. <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks, <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Brendan Mannella <BR>> <BR>> TeraSwitch Networks <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> force10-nsp mailing list<BR>> force10-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/force10-nsp<BR><BR>-- <BR>Jo Rhett<BR>senior geek<BR>Silicon Valley Colocation<BR></body></html>