[f-nsp] VRRP-E in combination with Route-Maps
Joseph Jackson
JJackson at aninetworks.com
Sun Feb 26 12:58:45 EST 2006
?
What type of routes are you getting from your providers? Full? Default route?
________________________________
From: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of A. Krijgsman - QCC
Sent: Sun 2/26/2006 4:17 AM
To: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] VRRP-E in combination with Route-Maps
Dear Gunther / All,
That would have been my first guess as well.
However when I try the bgp route to my provider B. (Below are my real
results.)
You will see it takes the longer AS-path trough provider A to the provider
B. IP :-(
Has this anything to do with the backup-priority / track-priority in VRRP-E?
Or is this default iBGP behaviour?
If anyone has a clue? :-)
Kind regards,
Armand
++++++++++++++++++++++++ MY RESULT +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SSH at ams-gs-rt2>show ip bgp 217.170.9.139
Number of BGP Routes matching display condition : 2
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 217.170.9.0/24 84.233.188.97 100 0 8928 15412
24785 24785 i
*i 217.170.9.0/24 217.170.9.129 100 0 24785 i
Last update to IP routing table: 2d1h4m16s, 1 path(s) installed:
Gateway Port
84.233.188.97 v1
Route is advertised to 1 peers:
195.144.2.2(35829)
++++++++++++++++++++++++ MY RESULT +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gunther Stammwitz" <gstammw at gmx.net>
To: "'A. Krijgsman - QCC'" <a.krijgsman at quality-control-centre.net>;
<foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: AW: [f-nsp] VRRP-E in combination with Route-Maps
> Hello Armand,
>
> I guess you're running BGP as outside/external routing protocol, right?
> Well... That would explain why traffic is flowing the way it is: if both
of
> your providers are supplying you with the same as-path-lengths for most of
> the prefixes - this is mostly happening when both of them are of the same
> tier-class like both are tier1 - your router is always going to prefer the
> the external path over the internal one.
> Example:
> Here we can see that the network 3.0.0.0/8 can be reached in 5 as-hops.
The
> internal path (5.6.7.8) as well as the external one have exactly the same
> lenght and localpref but the external one is being preferred. This is a
> standard mechanism in bgp (ebgp over ibgp).
>
> *> 3.0.0.0/8 1.2.3.4 999 0 12345 3356 701
> 703 80 i
> *i 3.0.0.0/8 5.6.7.8 0 999 0 12345 3356 701
> 703 80 i
>
> I hope this was a help.
> Gunther
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20060226/41f4fa2d/attachment.html>
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list