[f-nsp] Experiences with netiron MLX-platform

[Jayabalan Subramanian]

Dear Gunther,

Thankyou so much for the detailed response and valuable information. It
gives some confidence to me that BGP seems to be stable.

Infact when we started our discussions with vendors we were still having
some TDM links but now we have Ethernet only and thats the way to go.

We are still looking at getting information about the MPLS implementation on
MLX and any valuable information in this front will be helpful.

Thanks a lot again. I can assure you that If we decide to go with MLX it is
your inputs that have given us that confidence.

Regards,

JB

-----Original Message-----
From: Gunther Stammwitz [mailto:gstammw at gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:39 PM
To: 'Jayabalan Subramanian'; foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: AW: [f-nsp] Experiences with netiron MLX-platform


Hello JB,

Well... There's not much to report which is a good thing though.
The box is working very well. In our case we're running with 3 full bgp
views and a total of 10 bgp neighbors as well as a few ospf-links. Cpu load
is almost zero all the time and even several route flaps at the same time
don't let the mlx start sweating.
There was one minor software bug I encountered: the output of traceroute was
printed to the ssh console only after finishing the traceroute which was
nasty but nothing to worry about. It has been fixed and I'd call this system
really stable. With the old big irons there were some software issues in the
past but the MLX code seems to be far more stable.

Oh there is a limitation regarding the amount of bgp communities one can set
but this will be fixed or has already been fixed in the latest software
version due to my feature request.

In our case the support is being done by a local foundry partner and
response times as well as competence are both excellent.

We're now going to order four more boxes - some of them with 10GIG - since
we're satisfied and the cost-performance-ratio is really good.


You should pay attention to the fact that the MLX can only do Ethernet and
no SDH/SONET-Stuff but Ethernet is what people are using nowadays.

If you'd ask me... Go ahead and get a MLX :-) The 7600 has some tics
regarding the amount of routes it can handle. The small sup will only do
~230 in the fix and one needs to buy the larger one which is really
expensive. The mlx in contrast has a very stable fondry-direct-routing
system with cam-aggregation but hey: the cam is large enough for 1M routes
anyway so I wouldn't expect any problems in the future.


Best regards,
Gunther



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von
> Jayabalan Subramanian
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 09:26
> An: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Betreff: [f-nsp] Experiences with netiron MLX-platform
>
> Dear Gunther,
>
> My Name is Jayabalan (JB for short) and I am from India. I
> head technology for a Datacenter here called Netmagic
> Solutions. We are in the process of upgrading our core from
> 100M to Gigabit and need features like BGP, OSPF, MPLS and
> Multi-VRF apart from Rate-limiting and Hierarchical QOS. We
> have shortlisted Cisco 7600 and Netiron MLX For this
> requirement. The Foundry MLX is very attractively priced
> compared to Cisco. Since you have been using the MLX for a
> couple of months now, Can you please give me your experiences
> with the box till now from Performance standpoint, Management
> standpoint and Operational and troubleshooting standpoint? In
> India the Cisco gear is all over the place and We may be only
> one of Few who could be going the Foundry way..
>
> Your inputs will be highly appreciated.
>
> With Best Regards,
>
> JB
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This
> e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
> e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not
> to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents
> to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This
> e-mail may contain viruses.
> NetMagic Solutions Pvt. Ltd. has taken every reasonable
> precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any
> damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this
> e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before
> opening the e-mail or attachment. NetMagic Solutions Pvt.
> Ltd. reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
> all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
>
> Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on
> the NetMagic Solutions Pvt. Ltd.'s e-mail system.
> ***************** End of Disclaimer *******************
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
>







-- 
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are
not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other
person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses.
NetMagic Solutions Pvt. Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize
this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any
virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before
opening the e-mail or attachment. NetMagic Solutions Pvt. Ltd. reserves the
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this
e-mail address.

Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the NetMagic
Solutions Pvt. Ltd.'s e-mail system.
***************** End of Disclaimer *******************