[f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series

David Ball davidtball at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 12:29:02 EDT 2008


  Thanks for the great suggestions.  I tried setting the tag type manually and things worked great for both tagged or untagged.  
   That said, I have to think that there's a non-kludgy (please pardon the expression) way of doing this though, no ?  I mean, how do folks deliver Transparent Lan Services to their customers?
  I'll use the 'tag-type' workaround if I must..........but must I ?  I've tried 'raw-mode' with untagged endpoints, which works great for untagged, but as soon as it's tagged, it only works in 1 direction (from Juniper to XMR, not the other way around).  the MTU is 1500, but the test set is generating 1280 frames, so MTU shouldn't be hindering it...

vll xmrtop-t640-vll 500 raw-mode
  vll-peer 172.16.0.1
  untag e 2/11         


David


On 11/04/2008, Asoka De Saram <adesaram at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Try to using SAV + VLL 
>   
> XMR global config 
>   
> tag-type 9100 e 1/1 
>   
> router mpls 
> vll test100 100 
> vll-peer <juniper> 
> untag e 1/1 
>   
> You can send traffic with any VLAN ID and XMR will transparently switch. 
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "David Ball" <davidtball at gmail.com>
> 
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:34:48 
> To:foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series
> 
> 
>   Is it possible to build a transparent VLL from an XMR?  I've
> successfully got a VLL running between an XMR and a Juniper, with the
> XMR endpoint specified as 'untagged' and the VLL in 'raw-mode'.  If I
> send untagged traffic, all is well.  As soon as I send tagged traffic,
> it breaks.  Given the 'untagged' command for the XMR endpoint, I guess
> I'm not surprised, but I'd ideally like to be able to receive untagged
> OR tagged traffic and just send it to the far end (ie. transparent,
> not caring if tagged or untagged).  I'd rather not have to
> manage/maintain any VLANs that the customer may be sending us, but I'm
> still trying to get my head around how it might be done (do I use
> raw-mode or not?  Is the XMR endpoint untagged or tagged if I don't
> want to 'care'?).  Nudges in the right direction would be appreciated.
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 



More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list