[f-nsp] CES/CER2000 Products

[Samit]

Hi,

Are there any significance difference between CES/CER and MLX/XMR
software feature specifically for MPLS/VPLS ?

Regards,
Samit


Joel Mulkey wrote:
> We have quite a few of the CES2000 ME-PREM units in place. We're very happy with them. We're using MPLS VLL and VPLS, RSVP, OSPF, MRP, and other basic features. We have had zero hardware failures (we installed them at the beginning of the year). We've kept them on the latest code and have had very few issues with bugs. The bugs we did have were all fixed and they're running smoothly now.
> 
> Prior to this purchase we looked at the Juniper J-series and we steered clear of them primarily due to the software-forwarding. They also seem to have quite a few configuration limitations in comparison with the M-series boxes. The config limitations of the CES are minimal (for our needs) and are slowly eroding in new versions of code.
> 
> Joel Mulkey
> CIO
> Freewire Broadband
> Direct: 503-616-2557 | Support: 503-614-8282
> http://www.gofreewire.com
> http://twitter.com/FreewireNetwork
> 
> On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:00 AM, foundry-nsp-request at puck.nether.net wrote:
>> Am 23.08.2010 16:56, schrieb William Jackson:
>>> Does anyone have any feedback regarding features/stability and
>>> performance on these platforms?
>>>
>>> We are looking at upgrading our some equipment and whilst waiting for
>>> demo units to arrive would like to hear what others think have
>>> experienced?
>>>
>>> We have been looking at Juniper SRX650 boxes, which whilst are feature
>>> rich are software forwarding and don?t have hardware forwarding for
>>> routed traffic.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 
>