[f-nsp] VRRP ip-address question

[Joseph Hardeman]

Hi Everyone,

I just looked at what I put down in the example and realized it was 
totally wrong.  Should be:

interface ve 100
   ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.224
   ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.254
ip vrrp vrid 100
   ip-address 192.168.1.1
   ip-address 192.168.2.1

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Joe

On 10/27/2010 8:42 PM, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This may be a silly question, but I was doing some thinking and wanted 
> to know if it was possible.
>
> If I have a VLAN with multiple subnets on it, for example 
> 192.168.1.1/27 and 192.168.2.1/28, can the vrrp that handles that 
> virtual router interface handle multiple ip-address(es) in a single 
> "ip vrrp vrid" section or would there need to be multiple "ip vrrp 
> vrid" sections on the interface?
>
> For example:
>
> interface ve 100
>   ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.224.0
>   ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.254.0
> ip vrrp vrid 100
>   ip-address 192.168.1.1
>   ip-address 192.168.2.1
>
> I am just curious if this would work.  I haven't tried it, but I would 
> think it would.
>
> I hope I asked that right. :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe