[f-nsp] foundry-nsp Digest, Vol 99, Issue 18

[Adam E Barratt (Network Operations)]

Fesx6xx has support as well.  


Adam

On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:00 AM, foundry-nsp-request at puck.nether.net wrote:

> Send foundry-nsp mailing list submissions to
>    foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    foundry-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    foundry-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of foundry-nsp digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? (George B.)
>   2. Re: No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? (Mike Allen)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:58:13 -0700
> From: "George B." <georgeb at gmail.com>
> To: foundry-nsp <foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [f-nsp] No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL????
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=5U3AcjvfaaO9S5VqVH8HBFz6BCw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> So I was looking at an application coming up,  this just can't be real.  I
> am looking at the release notes for the latest code for FCX and is this
> right?  Tell me this is a misprint.  No IPv6 support at ALL?  Not even
> static routes?  I have an old Cisco Cat6500 with Sup-II modules that will
> static route IPv6.
> 
> So in a small form factor the *only* hardware Brocade has capable of doing
> IPv6 is CER/CES???  Please tell me this is not correct and is some sort of a
> documentation goof.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110422/1d5f27dc/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:55:24 -0700
> From: Mike Allen <mkallen at gmail.com>
> To: "George B." <georgeb at gmail.com>
> Cc: foundry-nsp <foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL????
> Message-ID: <BANLkTim0oss3R9CTv=kKOvqvfYgggspi1Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> George, right now that is correct, but it is changing.  With the next major
> software release, IPv6 routing will be supported on the FCX with no
> additional licensing or cost.  Still a couple months out, but it is being
> addressed.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, George B. <georgeb at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> So I was looking at an application coming up,  this just can't be real.  I
>> am looking at the release notes for the latest code for FCX and is this
>> right?  Tell me this is a misprint.  No IPv6 support at ALL?  Not even
>> static routes?  I have an old Cisco Cat6500 with Sup-II modules that will
>> static route IPv6.
>> 
>> So in a small form factor the *only* hardware Brocade has capable of doing
>> IPv6 is CER/CES???  Please tell me this is not correct and is some sort of a
>> documentation goof.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110422/2496c4fc/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 
> End of foundry-nsp Digest, Vol 99, Issue 18
> *******************************************
>