[f-nsp] MLXe-4 vs ASR1006 vs MX80

Moriniaux Michel mmoriniaux at prosodie.com
Tue Apr 26 12:50:14 EDT 2011


Hello All,
Last pres we got the MLXe does 1m in FIB, our current MLX only do 512k
(IIRC you can put regular MLX cards in an MLXe but then you only get the
512k FIB)

If you are lokking for something in the MX80/ASR1k class why not look at
the CER?
Dirt cheap, same feature set as MLX but only 1U. The CER coming out this
summer support 1.5m routes in FIB.

Best Regards,
Michel Moriniaux

> -----Original Message-----
> From: foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Chris Marlatt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:34 PM
> To: Nick Hilliard
> Cc: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] MLXe-4 vs ASR1006 vs MX80
> 
> On 04/26/2011 08:37 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > MLXe-4: 400G backplane, 1m ipv4 prefixes, far faster than either the
> > ASR1006 or the MX80, but fewer features, particularly in 
> terms of hqos
> 
> IIRC the MLX only does up to ~512k IPv4 routes. The XMR is 
> the chassis that'll support higher than this.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chris Marlatt
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> 




More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list