[f-nsp] Any problems with VDX line up?

[John pp]

What we are planning to do is run 2 VDX 8770's at distribution coming from
our MX's at core, then having the 6710's at TOR.
This utilizes TRILL so we can effectively run 60Gbit to the rack, I want to
make sure these have a good l3 forwarding table as the RX (last layer3
experience with brocade) fell over with a mid sized SYN attack (few m pps)

Brocade comes out cheaper than other solutions (cisco specifically) even
when you have distrib pricing.


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:52 PM, i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt <
martijnschmidt at i3d.net> wrote:

>  +1 here, running a single VDX6720 in L3 mode with OSPF for internal
> routing, static routes for internet connectivity, and VRRP-e pre-configured
> in case I want to add a second VDX to the fabric at a later point. It has
> been stable on NOS3.0.1a for a few months now.
>
> You are best off running L3 on a VDX8770 or VDX6740; the former has been
> GA for a while now, but the latter is still under development. These two
> models were designed with L3 functionality in mind while the VDX6720 was
> originally designed for L2 with its routing functionality to be added a few
> years later. If you were looking at a VDX6720 now, I'd recommend waiting a
> few months for the VDX6740 release and buy that instead.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn Schmidt
> Network Engineer
>
> Contact:
> E-mail Personal:            martijnschmidt at i3d.net
> E-mail Support:             info at i3d.net
> E-mail NOC:                 noc at i3d.net
> Website:                    http://www.i3d.net
>
> Office:
> Interactive 3D B.V.
> Meent 93b
> 3011 JG Rotterdam
> The Netherlands
>
> Visit www.smartdc.net – SmartDC is our in-house 36,000 sq. ft. datacenter in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. High density hosting – multiple fiber carriers in-house – Level3 PoP.
> Interactive 3D (i3D.net) is a company registered in The Netherlands at Meent 93b, Rotterdam. Registration #: 14074337 - VAT # NL 8202.63.886.B01. Interactive 3D (i3D.net) is CDSA certified on content protection and security. We are ranked in the Deloitte Technology Fast 50 as one of the fastest growing technology companies.
>
> On 08/27/2013 05:26 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
>
> I'm running a cluster of VDX 6720s with OSPF and static routes... no
> problems so far.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Ryan Harden <hardenrm at uchicago.edu>wrote:
>
>> What were the problems you had with MLX/RX? I've generally had good luck
>> with MLX and MLXe and Layer3.
>>
>> /Ryan
>>
>> Ryan Harden
>> Senior Network Engineer
>> University of Chicago - AS160
>> P: 773-834-5441
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:58 AM, John pp <luklaupdates at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I am considering the VDX 8770's and VDX 6710's, will be doing full
>> layer3 on them while utilizing VRRP..Anyone have a similar setup? , if so
>> please alert of me of any issues.
>> >
>> > I've had layer3 issues with the MLX and RX line which is why I'm
>> hesitant to spend any significant amount of money before I'm sure its a
>> concrete solution..
>> >
>> > Appreciate it
>> >
>> >
>>  > _______________________________________________
>> > foundry-nsp mailing list
>> > foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing listfoundry-nsp at puck.nether.nethttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20130827/2159dddb/attachment.html>