<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a topo-group</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Hi all,<BR>
<BR>
If you make a peer-group, you can set everything up, and then add the neighbor IP to the peer-group when all is set up.<BR>
<BR>
router bgp<BR>
neighbor foobar peer-group<BR>
neighbor foobar remote-as 39554 <BR>
neighbor foobar route-map in foo-in<BR>
neighbor foobar route-map out foo-out<BR>
<BR>
neighbor 12.34.56.78 peer-group foobar<BR>
exit<BR>
<BR>
That should work, as far as I remember.<BR>
<BR>
Cheers, Bjørn<BR>
<BR>
On 1/3/08 3:01 PM, "Peter Olsen" <Peter.Olsen@globalconnect.dk> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
Hi Gunther,<BR>
<BR>
Yes, it have been reported long time ago. Foundry do not consider it as a bug as the code is doing was is expected from it... so, it is a feature request<BR>
<BR>
br,<BR>
Peter<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Gunther Stammwitz [<a href="mailto:gstammw@gmx.net]">mailto:gstammw@gmx.net]</a><BR>
Sent: 3. januar 2008 14:58<BR>
To: Peter Olsen<BR>
Cc: foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net; goverton@nwi.net<BR>
Subject: AW: [f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a topo-group<BR>
<BR>
Hello Peter,<BR>
<BR>
did you already report this bug / feature request to foundry?<BR>
<BR>
This is as annoying as the problem with new bgp neighbors:<BR>
After configuring a new bgp neighbor with "nei 1.2.3.4 remote-as 123" the mlx automatically starts to bringt the session up which is a problem because you don't have a chance to configure route-maps first.<BR>
Cisco is expecting the user to use the command "nei 1.2.3.4 activate" or "no nei<BR>
1.2.3.4 shut" once so that the router knows that the configuration has been completed.<BR>
<BR>
I hope that foundry is going to implement this feature soon...<BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Gunther<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----<BR>
> Von: foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net<BR>
> [<a href="mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net]">mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net]</a> Im Auftrag von Peter<BR>
> Olsen<BR>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 08:15<BR>
> An: goverton@nwi.net; foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
> Betreff: Re: [f-nsp] What is the prefered way to add a vlan to a<BR>
> topo-group<BR>
[...]<BR>
> If thats the case there is only one way to prevent a loop and that is<BR>
> to take a physical port down.<BR>
> To my opinion this is a bug, e.g. if you strictly follow the manual<BR>
> you will create a loop unless you follow the manual recommandation<BR>
> about taking a physical port down.<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
foundry-nsp mailing list<BR>
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="5"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>