<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Mischa,<br><br>How come your numbers are much different then the link below? You are showing 10mil concurrent sessions and the pdf shows 15mil.<br><br>http://www.cpssales.com/documents/Foundry-Brocade/Foundry-ServerIron-350-450-850-Datasheet.pdf<br><br><br>Thanks,<br>Chase Bolt<br><br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Mischa Peters" <foundry@high5.nl><br>To: "Chase Bolt" <cbolt@denirostaff.com><br>Cc: foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<br>Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:42:03 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific<br>Subject: Re: [f-nsp] SI-350 vs SI-4G-SSL<br><br>Hi Chase,
The reason why it's almost impossible to get an SI-4G-SSL is because the unit is end-of-life. The Whole JetCore ServerIron line has been replaced by the ServerIron ADX.
In the SI-350 you can stick a WSM6-SSL1 or a WSM6-SSL2.
The WSM6-SSL-1 performs slightly better than an SI-4G-SSL, but the WSM6-SSL2 performs much better.
Additionally you get an extra slot in the SI-350, either for an extra line card or for an extra management card.
Here are some marketing numbers:
<br><br>[image/png:Screen shot 2010-07-23 at 07.41.03 .PNG]<br><br>
Mischa
On Jul 23, 2010, at 01:39 , Chase Bolt wrote:
> I can’t find a single vendor who has two SI-4G-SSL in stock and their recommendation would be to get an SI-350 with a SSL management card. Apparently they can get the price lower than the SI-4G-SSL which makes me think the SI-4G-SSL is a better unit; we all know higher the price better the unit right?
>
> Would it be best to hold out for the SI-4G-SSL or does the SI-350 perform equally? Is there a downside with going SI-350 besides increased U size?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chase Bolt
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
</div></body></html>