<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hey Mike,<br>
<br>
You wouldn't happen to know what version of code or when they
started supporting dynamic LACP over tagged links would be would
you?<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
On 1/7/2011 8:15 PM, Mike Allen wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTim-7f7XFW+fn5W_xAK1Yxo=bV=U17AMjdPTWmyf@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>Joe, Scott is likely on the right track. Early versions of
B4000/8000 code did not support dynamic LACP over tagged links.
Given that, your options are upgrading to a newer release, or
use static trunks as you mentioned. If you do the upgrade and
then do LACP over a tagged port, make sure you use a LACP key.
Other than that, it should work just fine between vendors. Hope
that helps.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mike<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Joseph
Hardeman <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jwhardeman@gmail.com">jwhardeman@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"
class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 1/7/2011 7:36 PM, Big Wave Dave wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,
204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"
class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM,
Joseph Hardeman<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jwhardeman@gmail.com" target="_blank">jwhardeman@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,
204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"
class="gmail_quote">Hi Everyone,<br>
<br>
I am having a bit of an issue, I have gotten a pair of
Cisco 6509's with the<br>
SUP-720 engines. I am trying to configure link
aggregation between one of<br>
these to a BI4000 I have to test with before we put
them into production and<br>
connect them to our BI8000's and fight this problem
then. I have been<br>
searching and looking at the docs I have. The
configuration I have on the<br>
Cisco's allow them to talk over the port channels
between each other with no<br>
issues.<br>
<br>
I can setup the command "link-aggregation active" on
port "ethe 1/5" with no<br>
issues it takes the command, but when I go to add a
test VLAN on to that<br>
port I get the following error message:<br>
<br>
error - some ports are running LACP and can not be
tagged ports.<br>
<br>
Here is the command I am running on the BI:<br>
<br>
test(config)#int e 1/5<br>
test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#link-aggregate configure key
10000<br>
test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#link-aggregate active<br>
test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#exit<br>
test(config)#vlan 14<br>
test(config-vlan-14)#tagged e 1/5<br>
error - some ports are running LACP and can not be
tagged ports.<br>
test(config-vlan-14)#end<br>
<br>
Here is the output of sh int e 1/5"<br>
GigabitEthernet1/5 is up, line protocol is up<br>
Hardware is GigabitEthernet, address is
00e0.52cc.3b04 (bia 00e0.52cc.3b04)<br>
Configured speed 1Gbit, actual 1Gbit, configured
duplex fdx, actual fdx<br>
Member of L2 VLAN ID 1, port is untagged, port state
is BLOCKING<br>
STP configured to ON, priority is level0, flow
control disabled<br>
mirror disabled, monitor disabled<br>
Not member of any active trunks<br>
Not member of any configured trunks<br>
No port name<br>
MTU 1518 bytes, encapsulation ethernet<br>
300 second input rate: 40104 bits/sec, 72
packets/sec, 0.00% utilization<br>
300 second output rate: 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec,
0.00% utilization<br>
899789 packets input, 62419802 bytes, 0 no buffer<br>
Received 372 broadcasts, 899417 multicasts, 0
unicasts<br>
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 ignored<br>
0 runts, 0 giants, DMA received 899786 packets<br>
0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns<br>
</blockquote>
> Transmitted 0 broadcasts, 0 multicasts, 0
unicasts<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,
204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"
class="gmail_quote"> 0 output errors, 0 collisions,
DMA transmitted 0 packets<br>
<br>
<br>
Output of sh link-aggregation:<br>
Long timeout: 90, default: 90<br>
Short timeout: 3, default: 3<br>
Port [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ]
[Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope]<br>
1/5 1 1 0 Yes S Agg Syn
Col Dis Def No Blo<br>
<br>
<br>
So my question is what am I missing here? From
everything I found, all I<br>
have to do after setting 1 or more ports into a
link-aggregation is to add<br>
the VLAN's as tagged to the ports with the same key.
But its not allowing<br>
me to add the tagged vlans.<br>
<br>
Any suggestions?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I've had similar problems before.<br>
My bookmark takes me to:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.techsneeze.com/create-vlan-trunk-between-cisco-ios-and-foundry-bigiron"
target="_blank">http://www.techsneeze.com/create-vlan-trunk-between-cisco-ios-and-foundry-bigiron</a><br>
<br>
Dave<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
Hi Dave<br>
<br>
Thanks for the link, but its only showing how to tag a vlan to
the port, which what I am currently doing but with the new
ciscos and adding more fiber between our routers and switches
I wanted to be able to do link aggregation. I am guessing I
can't with this system unless I go with Trunk mode.<br>
<br>
Joe
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
foundry-nsp mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net"
target="_blank">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp"
target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>