<html><head><style type="text/css">body {word-wrap: break-word; background-color:#ffffff;}</style></head><body><div style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px">I can confirm issues with cisco branded optics. No issues with extreme branded.<br><br><font color="#333333"><i><span style="font-size: 14px"><font face="sans-serif">Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless</font></span></i></font></div><br><br>-----Original message-----<br><blockquote style="; border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px"><b>From: </b>Pavel Lunin <plunin@senetsy.ru><b><br>To: </b>foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<b><br>Sent: </b>Thu, Apr 14, 2011 17:41:30 GMT+00:00<b><br>Subject: </b>[f-nsp] 3rd party optics<br><br></div>Hi all,<br><br>Can anyone confirm/disprove, that any Brocade product is know to have 'religious' restriction for 3rd party optics. Both SPF and XFP/SPF+.<br><br>I've been told it (non-native transceivers) is accepted, but there are some rumors…<br><br>--<br>Regards,<br>Pavel<br>_______________________________________________<br>foundry-nsp mailing list<br>foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<br><a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><br></blockquote></body></html>