<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>For basic testing, I would get rid of static host-based routes and use a default route pointed at the TI24. If that works, then the problem is with the machines, not the TI. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Drew Weaver<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 22, 2012 12:43 PM<br><b>To:</b> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net<br><b>Subject:</b> [f-nsp] Quick question regarding routing between vlans on Ti24<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have a Turboiron 24x configured as such:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>vlan 101 by port<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>tagged ethe 7<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>router-interface ve 101<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>vlan 998 by port<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>tagged ethe 19<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>router-interface ve 2<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>interface ve 2<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>ip address 192.168.227.1 255.255.255.248<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>interface ve 101<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.248<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The hosts (192.168.227.2) and (192.168.0.2) can both ping their respective VEs, but they cannot ping one another.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have static routes nailed up on the hosts:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>192.168.0.0 192.168.227.1 255.255.224.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>And<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>192.168.227.0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 em2<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Anyone know what I need to do to tell it to go ahead and route ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>p.s. the reason the subnets configured on the hosts are larger than what is configured on the TI is because I intend on having multiple subnets reachable in both directions.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-Drew<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>