<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Have you escalated this issue? What has TAC been telling you?<br><br>On Apr 27, 2013, at 6:36 PM, "Gunther Stammwitz" <<a href="mailto:gstammw@gmx.net">gstammw@gmx.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">Dear all,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">there was no useful feedback out of this community and yes, of course we have rebooted after applying the setting..<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">There is a <b>firmware-bug</b> with <b>cam-mode ipv4 dynamic </b>where the following warning appears in ones logs: “Warning: IPv4 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED” always occurs in ipv4 dynamic cam mode.”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">I found out that the XMR-MLX 5.3-tree is completely broken and have tested 5300c, 5300d and the latest 5300e.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">The 5.4tree seems to be broken too, at least 5400b is broken while I could not yet test 5400c.<br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D">à</span><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"> The <u>only stable version seems to be 5200h</u> out of the 5.2-tree, earlier versions are also broken.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">I have seen in the change log of 5200h that several cam-related bugs have been closed with “DEFECT000427885” but I cannot find these fixes in either 5300e or 5400c… which makes sense, because these versions show the problem mentioned above.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">Does anyone have an idea why foundry is not able to fix this bug?!?<br><br>Gunther<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:DE">Von:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:DE"> <a href="mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net">foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net</a> [<a href="mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net">mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net</a>] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Gunther Stammwitz<br><b>Gesendet:</b> </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:DE">Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012 01:22<br><b>An:</b> <a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br><b>Betreff:</b> [f-nsp] Problem with dynamic cam-mode on netiron mlx 5.3.00d: "Warning: IPv4 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED"<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Dear colleagues,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">has someone else seen problems with dynamic cam mode on the netiron mlx?<br>I have upgraded the system to 5.3.00d and switched from static to dynamic cam mode at the same time.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">From time to time I can see the following WARNING in the system log: “<b>Warning: IPv4 Route ADD: CAM entry creation FAILED</b>”.<br>Does anyone know why this is happening and if the router tries to program the problematic entry into the cam again or is it getting lost?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Has anyone else seen these problems before – if so: which version are you running?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-US">Is anyone running <b>dynamic cam-mode</b> without problems? If so: which version is running fine?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">This router is running bgp4 with full tables and two feeds and pushes about 3 gigabit per second on a NI-MLX-1Gx20-SFP-linecard in slot1.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">>show cam-partition brief<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">CAM partitioning profile: ipv4-ipv6-2<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Slot 1 XPP20SP 0:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"># of CAM device = 3<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Total CAM Size = 524288 entries (36Mbits)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">IP: Raw Size 491520, User Size 491520(0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> Subpartition 0: Raw Size 2048, User Size 2048, (0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> Subpartition 1: Raw Size 448283, User Size 448283, (0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> Subpartition 2: Raw Size 35001, User Size 35001, (0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> Subpartition 3: Raw Size 4819, User Size 4819, (0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> Subpartition 4: Raw Size 729, User Size 729, (0 reserved)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">[…]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">>show cpu lp 1<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">SLOT #: LP CPU UTILIZATION in %:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> in 1 second: in 5 seconds: in 60 seconds: in 300 seconds:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> 1: 8 8 8 8<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Kind regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Gunther<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>foundry-nsp mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a></span><br><span><a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>