<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hello,<br><br></div>Thank you for your feedback. Well, that's the point : I'm interested with 5.6 feature set.<br><br></div>I've been running 56b on a CER-RT for a month now, it's been steady and stable (even for a backup box). I think I'll keep away from 56c for now and go with b.<br>
<br></div>Am I the only one who's noticed that preparing upgrades with $B looks very much like playing the russian roulette ? Don' get me wrong, it's the same with other vendors.<br></div><div><br></div>Y.<br>
<br><br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-05-23 20:01 GMT+02:00 Fredy Kuenzler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kuenzler@init7.net" target="_blank">kuenzler@init7.net</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>As my colleague Markus already mentioned, 5.6c is seriously broken.</div><div><br>
</div><div>We (Init7 / AS13030) run 5.5d on most boxes (XMR, MLXe, CER) with full mesh iBGP (about 40 neighbors), hundreds of eBGP, both v4/v6, OSPF and MPLS really stable for months. If you are good with the 5.5 feature set and want to be on the safe side go for 5.5d.<br>
<br>--<div>Fredy Kuenzler<div>Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd.</div></div><div>St.-Georgen-Strasse 70</div><div>CH-8400 Winterthur</div><div>Switzerland</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.init7.net/" target="_blank">http://www.init7.net/</a></div>
<div><br></div></div><div><br>Am 23.05.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <<a href="mailto:youssef@720.fr" target="_blank">youssef@720.fr</a>>:<br><br></div><div><div class="h5"><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello,<br><br></div>Thanks for the feedback. I was planing to run 56b but Brocade advised us not to do that because of TSB TSB 2014-184-A :<br><br>"This is a high severity operational issue.<br>
<br>Affected Products:<br>NetIron XMR/MLX/CER/CES, MLX-e (5.6.00a and 5.6.00b only)<br> <br>Corrected in Release:<br>5.6.00c and above<br> <br>Bulletin Overview:<br>Facility FRR LSPs may drop traffic after local-repair, i.e., failover to backup."<br>
<br></div>I thought I would sit this one out and wait for 56c which corrects an awful lot of DEFECTS when reading the release notes.<br><br></div>Anyone else out there ?<br><div><div><div><br></div><div>Y.<br></div></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-05-23 18:16 GMT+02:00 Markus Wellauer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wellauer@init7.net" target="_blank">wellauer@init7.net</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Youssef,<br>
<br>
I would not recommend to use this code. We tried it on a MLXe-8. We<br>
just did a downgrade this morning because we ran into memory issues.<br>
First we were not able to connect via SSH to the IPv6 loopback address<br>
(v4 worked), later we were not able to connect via IPv4 as well. And<br>
finally we did not get any SNMP output anymore. Since the downgrade<br>
it's running stable again.<br>
<br>
We run BGP/OSPF/MPLS-LDP (VPLS/VLL)/IPv4 and IPv6 unicast BGP.<br>
<br>
Unfortunately I did not have the time to look deeper into it.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Markus<br>
<div><div><br>
On Fri, 23 May 2014 17:47:07 +0200<br>
Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <<a href="mailto:youssef@720.fr" target="_blank">youssef@720.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> Preparing deployment of 5.6c code. Any nasty things to be aware of ?<br>
><br>
> Y.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> > Le 1 mars 2014 à 14:18, Clement Cavadore <<a href="mailto:clement@cavadore.net" target="_blank">clement@cavadore.net</a>> a<br>
> > écrit :<br>
> ><br>
> > Hello again Youssef,<br>
> ><br>
> > Since the first message, I have noticed what seems to be a cosmetic<br>
> > bug (since it does not hurt anything, afaik) on the last 5.6:<br>
> ><br>
> > I have that kind of messages in my logs:<br>
> > Feb 15 23:55:18 rt-th2/lo1-rt-th2 IP/ARP: IP address 194.68.129.xxx<br>
> > MAC movement detected, changed from MAC 001b.53f4.6976 / port 1/13<br>
> > to MAC 001b.5374.6976 / port 1/13 Feb 16 03:02:33 rt-th2/lo1-rt-th2<br>
> > IP/ARP: IP address 194.68.129.yyy MAC movement detected, changed<br>
> > from MAC c47d.4f6b.7ac0 / port 1/13 to MAC c47d.4feb.7ac0 / port<br>
> > 1/13 Feb 16 03:02:33 rt-th2/lo1-rt-th2 IP/ARP: IP address<br>
> > 194.68.129.yyy MAC movement detected, changed from MAC<br>
> > c47d.4feb.7ac0 / port 1/13 to MAC c47d.4f6b.7ac0 / port 1/13 Feb 16<br>
> > 03:20:11 rt-th2/lo1-rt-th2 IP/ARP: IP address 194.68.129.zzz MAC<br>
> > movement detected, changed from MAC 001b.2109.d2a6 / port 1/13 to<br>
> > MAC 001b.2189.d2a6 / port 1/13 Feb 16 03:20:11 rt-th2/lo1-rt-th2<br>
> > IP/ARP: IP address 194.68.129.zzz MAC movement detected, changed<br>
> > from MAC 001b.2189.d2a6 / port 1/13 to MAC 001b.2109.d2a6 / port<br>
> > 1/13<br>
> ><br>
> > There is no MAC change or physical port change, 1/13 is connected<br>
> > to an IX (tagged mode, vlan 2 + ve2), and is route-only.<br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Clément<br>
> ><br>
> >> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 11:57 +0000, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:<br>
> >> Hello,<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> Anyone else ?<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> Best regards.<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> Le 19 févr. 2014 à 09:48, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <<a href="mailto:youssef@720.fr" target="_blank">youssef@720.fr</a>><br>
> >> a écrit :<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >>> Hello,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thank you for the feedback Clement.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Looking for someone running MLXe + CER-RT with :<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ISIS / BFD / MPLS-LDP (VPLS mostly) / MPLS-RSVP-TE / BGP full<br>
> >>> views<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Very basic setup.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thanks.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> 2014-02-19 10:08 GMT+01:00 Clement Cavadore<br>
> >>> <<a href="mailto:clement@cavadore.net" target="_blank">clement@cavadore.net</a>>: Hi,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Nothing notable for me, atm... I have been running it on a<br>
> >>> couple of my<br>
> >>> CER-RT, withing a quite simple setup (BGP Fullview with<br>
> >>> IX/MPLS-LDP/OSPF) and everything went fine, in my setup.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> --<br>
> >>> Clément Cavadore<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:03 +0100, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr<br>
> >>> wrote:<br>
> >>>> Hello,<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Anyone running NI5.6 on MLXe/CER-RT out there ?<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Any gotchas of nasty things to be aware of ?<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Thank you for your feedbacks.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Best regards.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> --<br>
> >>>> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR<br>
> >>><br>
> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
> >>>> foundry-nsp mailing list<br>
> >>>> <a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> >>>> <a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp" target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> --<br>
> >>> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR<br>
> >> _______________________________________________<br>
> >> foundry-nsp mailing list<br>
> >> <a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> >> <a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp" target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> foundry-nsp mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp" target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
</div></div>Markus Wellauer<br>
<br>
---------------------<br>
Fiber7. No Limits.<br>
<a href="https://www.fiber7.ch" target="_blank">https://www.fiber7.ch</a><br>
---------------------<br>
<br>
Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd<br>
AS13030<br>
St. Georgen-Strasse 70<br>
CH-8400 Winterthur<br>
phone: <a href="tel:%2B41%2044%20315%2044%2000" value="+41443154400" target="_blank">+41 44 315 44 00</a><br>
fax: <a href="tel:%2B41%2044%20315%2044%2001" value="+41443154401" target="_blank">+41 44 315 44 01</a><br>
twitter: @init7_noc<br>
<a href="http://www.init7.net/" target="_blank">http://www.init7.net/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR<br>
</div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>foundry-nsp mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp" target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a></span></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAH
</div></div></div>