<div dir="auto"><div>Are you using the default CAM partition profile? It's probably not suitable for a full table.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Do all of your cards have the same FIB size, and is this large enough for the number of installed routes?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Any IPv6 routes? IIRC, the advertised max FIB sizes are with all CAM allocated to IPv4.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-- </div><div dir="auto">Eldon</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 13:13 Derek Maxwell <<a href="mailto:derek.maxwell@trueinnovation.net">derek.maxwell@trueinnovation.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello Foundry List,<div><br></div><div>We're currently launching a new site and using a Brocade/Foundry XMR. While I've built a number of simple to moderate configs in RX over the last few years, the XMR is new territory. When I tried to build the same config that I would use in a RX, I encountered odd, intermittent, and unexplained behavior. I didn't realize that IronWare would be significantly different between the two, as the syntax looks the same, so I was caught a bit off guard. </div><div><br></div><div>I'm looking for a consultant to do a one-off project to build a solid config, likely addressing things that I would miss even if I didn't have the odd issues listed above. I'd prefer to pay to do things properly the first time.</div><div><br></div><div>This unit is for a colocation site with 2 full BGP tables coming in, a Layer 2 circuit which provides IP to our office in the same metro, a handful of routed virtual interfaces, and a small number of VLANs. The single XMR comprises the entire colo network at this point, as it is just a single cabinet deployment. We may add Arista 25G equipment for hyperconverged storage purposes in the future, but that would likely not extend to the Brocade side.</div><div><br></div><div>Does anyone have interest in building this out? We are currently running the Layer 2 and a single BGP (default only) table on a FCX and it's stable, so there isn't incredible urgency until I return from vacation at the end of July.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="m_-3195669392968968294gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Derek Maxwell</div></div></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
foundry-nsp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br>
<a href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>