Heathkit Question

WB2TBB ham at CYBERCOMM.NET
Tue Nov 10 16:32:58 EST 1998


SB102???, SB401???
YIKES, They'd go out of business all over again!!
I would strongly vote for the cantenna dummy load, then
perhaps antenna tuners.
The majority of new tuners out there are Mighty Fine Junk, so
there is a market to be tapped!
Just my .02 worth!
...Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: George Gleim <george at QNQ.COM>
To: HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV <HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 1:29 PM
Subject: Heathkit Question


>Hello Green guys,
>
>I have a question that I'd like to put to the group and ask that you
>share your comments with all.
>
>
>The question is:
>
>If Heathkit were to 're-manufacture' any single Amateur Radio product
>(radio and/or complete station) which radio(s) should it be and why.
>
>For example, I think that the SB-102 Transceiver, HW-23 Power Supply,
>and SP-600 Speaker would be the best choice followed VERY close by the
>Heathkit SB-401, SB-301 twins and SP-600 Speaker.
>
>Both of these radio stations represent quality engineering, ease of use,
>ease of service, and represent a formidable Ham Station even when put
>next to todays 'computer' radios.
>
>Your thoughts, please.
>
>Thanks!
>
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
>To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>and in body: signoff HEATH
>Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
>--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff HEATH
Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --




More information about the Heath mailing list