6146'S

Edward B Richards k6uuz at JUNO.COM
Thu Jan 7 21:30:38 EST 1999


Hi to you, too, Russ;
The commercial bands are LO-Band: 25 to 50 mc.; Hi-Band 132 to 174 Mc.;
and 450; 450 to 470 mc. All the major manufacturers used one or two
6146's in both their Lo-Band  and HI-Band transmitters. The common
ratings were Lo-Band: single ended 30 watts, double ended 60 watts.
Hi-Band was: single ended 25 watts, and double ended 50 watts. I recall
one Motorola model rated at 60 watts. This is the power out as measured
with a Bird thruline or termaline wattmeter at the antenna connector. I
don't know of any Heathkit radios using 6146's at two meters, although
you should be able to get 60 watts rms icas. I hope this answers your
question  (big grin).
Ed


On Thu, 07 Jan 1999 18:12:07 -0500 Russ Hines <radioruss at fuse.net>
writes:
>Hi Edward:
>
>One more time with emphasis:  I know 6146's were used through 6
>meters.
><big smile>
>
>And a LOT of manufacturers used them in their rigs.  Guess that makes
>it
>the best tube to use from DC to light. ;-)
>
>I thought the commercial rigs you mentioned used something else, like
>6850's.  No?  A pair of 6146's at 170 Mhz generates what... 40 watts
>maybe?  Very efficient.<grin>
>
>73,
>WB8ZCC
>
>Edward B Richards wrote:
>>
>> I can't resist this one! I suggest you advise Motorola, GE, RCA and
>other
>> manufactures of commercial equipment of this. They apparently don't
>know
>> because they have sold thousands of radios with one or two 6146 in
>the
>> final and rated them up to 174 mc. I have serviced many, many of
>them in
>> my 40 years of being a 2-way radio senior technician. Look up a
>Motorola
>> U43GGV-3100 or a GE MA/E/T33
>> . Regards'
>> Ed Richards
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 08:46:15 -0500 Russ Hines <radioruss at fuse.net>
>writes:
>> >Oh, my.  I know there's equipment about that used 6146's on 6
>meters
>> >(tube
>> >specs say as high as 60 Mhz), but they don't belong that high.  A
>> >great HF
>> >final amp, up to about 15 meters or so.
>> >
>> >Don Goshay wrote:
>> >>
>> >> the extra structure necessitated by rugggedization.  This ought
>not
>> >to
>> >> be a problem on the lower HF bands, but should be considered if
>your
>> >> rig covers 10 and/or 6 meters!  Don Goshay, PE W6MMU/0
>> >>
>> >
>> >--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>> >To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>> >and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
>> >To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
>> >and in body: signoff HEATH
>> >Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
>> >--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
>> >
>

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff HEATH
Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --




More information about the Heath mailing list