Transceive cables for SB series

[Michael Tallent]

RG-174 is the small 50 ohm coax.  In an application calling for RG-62
which is 92-93 ohm coax, the reason is probably for the lower
capacitance of this coax.  So if you don't have RG-62, the next best
choice would be RG-59, 75 ohm coax.  The low loss foam insulation type
has slightly lower capacitance per foot than standard RG-59.  If you
keep the length as short as you can, it might work OK.

Mike T

"Guy G. Giacopuzzi DDS" wrote:
>
> Nick Marsh wrote:
> >
> > The book says to use RG-62 cable for the transceive rf functions between
> > the SB3xx and SB4xx.
> >
> > Is this necessary? Can I use RG-58?
> >
> > If 62 is a requirement, where can one find it?
>
> I have the same question regarding RG-174, used with the 303'/401'
> combo...
>
> ggg
>
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
> To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
> and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
> To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
> and in body: signoff HEATH
> Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
> --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe HEATH yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe:  listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff HEATH
Archives for HEATH: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --