SB-301 Frontend tubes...sensitivity

[Eddy Swynar]

Hi Kees & all...

You want a REALLY hot tube for the front end of your SB-300/301..? Try a
6DK6---a MUCH better direct replkacement for ALL those subs mentioned...

Drop one in (a GOOD one!)---you'll see what I mean.

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ



----- Original Message -----
From: "talen" <talen at inetport.com>
To: <HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 1:52 AM
Subject: SB-301 Frontend tubes...sensitivity


> little bit of a continuation of the previous SB-104A story..........
>
> Started out with the original 6BZ6 and tried a 6GM6 and 6EW6
> with much higher gm and lower capacitance. Should see an
> instant improvement of S/N radio....right ? The only problem is
> that the tubes are not new (may be your story too).
>
> Interesting data. My SB-301 is a little picky on levels so it's more
> difficult to set the Noise level because it tends to vary around 30mV
> ....all the way from 25mV to sometimes bouncing up to 40mV but I
> tried to get it as stable as possible. There is more variation than on
> the SB-104....maybe due to some marginal component...a leaky
> cap further down the line or a noisy switch on the SB-301, etc ?
>
> The results were about the same, varying from around 15.4db for the
> 6BZ6, to 14.8db for the 6GM6, to 15.5db for the 6EW6. I'd say all are
> +/- 0.5db considering the above.
>
> The key point is tube transconductance emissions is indicated by
> the tester and is directly related to tube gm. On the TV-7 the tubes
> test as follows:
>
> 6BZ6 "58" with "32" as the minimum acceptable
>      ........or 81% better than min
> 6GM6 "46" with "38" as the minimum acceptable
>      .......or 21% better than min
> 6EW6 "76" with "52" as the minimum acceptable
>      .......or 46% better than min
>
> You can see that this 6BZ6 is a pretty "hot" tube. Since we are using
> the same circuit, not optimized for the other tubes, test them all using
> the the 6BZ6 TV-7 setup to get "relative data" seems appropriate:
>
> 6BZ6   "58"
> 6GM6  "56"
> 6EW6  "56"
>
> To draw any conclusions, I need to test a "hot" 6GM6/6EW6 which I
> don't have but the answer may be to optimize the circuit for a particular
> tube or get the "hottest" one for a given application.
>
> 73s  Kees K5BCQ
>
> Listserver Subscription:listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - "subscribe heath
'name' 'call'"
> Listserver Submissions: heath at listserv.tempe.gov
> Listserver Unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - -"signoff heath"
>
>

Listserver Subscription:listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - "subscribe heath 'name' 'call'"
Listserver Submissions: heath at listserv.tempe.gov
Listserver Unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - -"signoff heath"