GC-1000 Most Accurate Clock[via LSMTP - see www.lsoft.com]

[Donald A. Anderson]

Harvey: My GC 1000 is working fine, 7 months after the "supposed" Y2K scare.  In fact,
nothing that I have with a microprocessor failed.  Even my older computers!  And I don't
know anyone else who had any failures.  I think that lots of us were fooled into
believing by those that write expensive newsletters, sell survival products and
alternative energy devices.  They made a lot of money on us poor "believers." Why is it
so easy to be so gullible?  It must be true that there is a sucker born every minute.

Don  K4DAA

"Harvey A. Kader" wrote:

> Does anybody know if the GC-1000 Most Accurate Clock will work past Dec.
> 31, 1999. In other words, does its ICs have a Y2K problem? This has been
> touched upon on this reflector before. I remember something about one of
> its ICs only being good fro 15 years from the original date of
> programming(1980s).
>
> If the ICs have a Y2K problem, will the clock function anyway past
> Dec.31, 1999, or will it NOT work at all? Can the problem be fixed?
>
> Also, was GC-1000 the original Most Accurate Clock? There was a
> subsequent Most Accurate Clock II - does anybody know its model number?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Harvey.
>
> Listserver Subscription:listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - "subscribe heath 'name' 'call'"
> Listserver Submissions: heath at listserv.tempe.gov
> Listserver Unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - -"signoff heath"

Listserver Subscription:listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - "subscribe heath 'name' 'call'"
Listserver Submissions: heath at listserv.tempe.gov
Listserver Unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - -"signoff heath"