{Collins} Re: Avoiding Scams

[rayfri]

As a journalist with over 30  years experience, I can tell you
positively that there is no reason you cant tell the name now.
It's public record and so is the judgement.  If I were to go to
the courthouse and look at the file there would be nothing legally
or morally to prevent me from reporting to the public that a judgement
had been entered against the company and in favor of the amateur as
well as the entire story surrounding the case.... and youve already
given the story.
ray  wa7itz

Glen Zook wrote:
>
> Such is true.  However, since I was involved directly
> in the case (as an "expert" witness), I am not in the
> position of being a neutral observor.  However, I am a
> sincere believer in the principal of caveat emptor
> ("buyer beware").
>
> Glen, K9STH
>
> --- w2wurjj at impop.bellatlantic.net wrote:
> > Glen, et al:
> > Right on.  However, nothing precludes us from not
> > doing business with them or
> > telling someone to investigate (caveat emptor). Ron,
> > W2WU

Listserver Subscription:listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - "subscribe heath 'name' 'call'"
Listserver Submissions: heath at listserv.tempe.gov
Listserver Unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov - -"signoff heath"