SB-301 and SB-303 questions

Tom Azlin tom at NILZA.ORG
Thu Mar 14 19:55:01 EST 2002


Hi Mark,

I've got both receivers and think the SB-301 is a better
receiver.  When I read the QST review it seemed to me they kind
of came to the same conclusion.

73, Tom n4zpt

3/14/02 16:41:43, Mark Graalman WB8JKR <wb8jkr at JUNO.COM> wrote:

>  I have a friend that is considering an SB-303 receiver,
>I've never used one myself but I do have a SB-301 that
>I'm quite impressed with.
> I'm looking for any comments on the SB-303 as far as
>just how good a receiver it is or isn't, and maybe even
>how it compares to the SB-301
>
>Thanks,
>
>73,  Mark WB8JKR
>
>Novice 3/71,  General 8/72,   Advanced 6/80,   Extra 8/88
>Member Society of Cable Telecommunication Engineers
>Member ARRL, QCWA, WAC, WAS, VUCC 2 meters, GJDXCC, OTC, RCC,
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?
list=HEATH
>To post - HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
>Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/HEATH.html
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=HEATH
To post - HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/HEATH.html




More information about the Heath mailing list