Electrolytics and Old Caps
digital-conjurers at ADELPHIA.NET
digital-conjurers at ADELPHIA.NET
Mon Aug 2 13:21:26 EDT 2004
Mike,
This is the preferred approach at this shack.
The "traditional wisdom" has always been to replace wax-and-paper, electrolytic, and paper-and-foil caps, as well as any resistor 20% or more out of spec in vintage gear.
You're dealing with components that are 40, 50+ years old. Piecemeal part replacement usually results in the remaining weaker, old parts being put under higher B+ voltage, and that means a failure not too far down the road; sometimes a catastrophic one that can damage very hard-to-get and expensive components, like transformers, filter chokes, field coils in dynamic speakers, etc, etc.
Think of a concrete dam analogy: the thing has many leaks (old, leaky caps), and the water level and dam pressure is low as a result...plug one and the level/pressure rises...and the rest of the leaks start running faster. Worst case, there's a blowout.
In the radio with old, leaky caps, say the B+ is limping along at 40% under spec. Oh, the set will still work, but not as good as it could. Replace one or two caps, the B+ rises, and something weak in the same line may not like the additional strain; it's been limping along with 40% under voltage for a long time. POW! And when it goes, it may go shorted, not open, the B+ goes right to ground, and the rest of your power supply components (and some other things) may take the hike with it. Fuses may or may not prevent a catastrophe.
Now, having said this, there are SOME cases where it may make sense to keep the older electrolytics...like a transmitter where the things are $40 a crack, you use several of them, you're on a tight budget and they all test out good at rated specs on a good cap checker.
But if price is no problem, replace 'em, and sleep well at night.
-Lin/KJ6EF
At 07:49 AM 08/02/2004, Mike wrote:
>Check out the specs for electrolytics - as rated in
>hours... read them in the specs printed in Digikey
>and Mouser electronics catalogs, easy to obtain. 5000
>hours running continuously is less than a year! and
>typical is 3000 hours... and caps age (although
>differently) with power off.
>
>I met a guy years ago that refurbished old high-end
>home audio equipment. BEFORE ANYTHING, even power up
>and test, he clipped out ALL the caps and replaced
>them. not just electrolytics either.
>
>Older electrolytics were probably rated much LESS than
>our new caps. So I doubt equipment with 30 year old
>electrolytics is running perfectly. I suspect you
>would actually experience improved performance if old
>caps are replaced. (power supply levels and
>regulation especially would improve.)
>
>Mike
>W2MK
-----------------------------------------------------------
Products bought, sold or traded here is the responsibility of the
parties involved. This list and the City of Tempe are not responsible
for losses or misrepresentations of any kind. Buyer beware!
-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------
Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=HEATH
To post - HEATH at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/HEATH.html
More information about the Heath
mailing list