SB-102 - more troubles

[Glen Zook]

The problems that I have seen in the solid-state LMO in the SB-102 is not stability.  They seem to be as stable as the tube-types.  However, it has been my experience that the company that manufactured the solid-state LMOs did not perform the close calibration that TRW did on the tube-type.  In every SB-102 that I have worked on the LMOs were pretty much "spot on" at the 100 kHz points.  But, in between I have seen them as much as 5 kHz off from the dial reading.

I understand that there is an amateur radio operator somewhere down in Florida who will work on getting the calibration of the solid-state LMOs just as good as the tube-type.  From what I have heard this is basically a "labor of love" because what he charges is very small when considering all the work that is required.  Unfortunately, his name and call escape me right now!

Glen, K9STH

Website:  http://k9sth.com


--- On Tue, 7/14/09, Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at VERIZON.NET> wrote:

Some folks think that the earlier LMOs are more stable than the solid-state version in the SB-102, but I think that idea grew because of the same problem that Brian is having.
 
My SB-102 LMO is much more stable than any of my SB rigs with the tube-based LMO in them.


      

-----------------------------------------------------------
Products bought, sold or traded here is the responsibility of the
parties involved.  This list and the City of Tempe are not responsible
for losses or misrepresentations of any kind.  Buyer beware!

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=HEATH
To post - HEATH at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/HEATH.html