IM-25 modification

Ron ra.ah at VERIZON.NET
Fri Sep 18 17:14:17 EDT 2009


Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2009 at 6:14, Ron wrote:
>
>   
>> The IM-25 solid state VOM is a marked improvement over 
>> the various VTVM models offered by Heathkit over the years. 
>> It can measure current and its voltage Sensitivity is x10 better.
>>
>> I recently got an IM-25, intending to replace my trusty IM-13 
>> VTVM. Turned out, the IM-25 requires a 1.35V mercury 
>> battery for the Ohms function, that is unobtainable 
>> because Mercury batteries have been banned in most of
>> the world. While it's still possible to find NOS cells, their 
>> price exceeds the cost of the IM-25. 
>>     
>
> Ron:
>
> First of all, I don't have a schematic for the IM-25, so the 
> following information may not be of much help with this 
> problem.
>
> Hoiwever, secondly, there is an article in the most recent 
> issue of Electric Radio magazine in which the author 
> replaced the battery in the "Ohms" circuit of his V-7 VTVM 
> with a small circuit board using three diodes (two as voltage 
> regulators), one cap, and two resistors, which uses the 
> filament voltage as the power source.
>
> Thirdly, I own an older 35 mm SLR camera which uses 
> TWO of those mercury "button" cells to power the internal 
> light meter. When I needed to replace those, a "local" 
> battery house found some alkaline cells for me which were 
> exact replacements.
>   
Be careful, though. Alkaline replacements -- while
physically identical to the mercury cells -- output
1.55V. Light meters rely on the 1.35V provided
by mercury cells.

I've seen on the web a few regulator designs to
reduce 1.55V to 1.35V. The problem with these
is their current draw, that reduces life of the cell.
There is no component I know off that will drop
a constant 0.2V with varying current and/or
temperature.
> Lastly, the reason for using mercury cells is that they 
> maintain their rated voltage within a very few percent until 
> immediately before they are completely dead.
>   
Exactly. 

> In this case, except for those who don't want to build your 
> circuit into their meters, I think your solution is the best I 
> have heard of yet.
>   
Thanks much for your response. I was hoping for
a better solution I might have overlooked, but, I
guess, no such luck...

-- Ron


> Ken Gordon W7EK

-----------------------------------------------------------
Products bought, sold or traded here is the responsibility of the
parties involved.  This list and the City of Tempe are not responsible
for losses or misrepresentations of any kind.  Buyer beware!

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=HEATH
To post - HEATH at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/HEATH.html




More information about the Heath mailing list