[Heath] The Heathkit IP-27
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Jun 6 12:55:07 EDT 2012
On 6 Jun 2012 at 12:15, MICHAEL TALLENT wrote:
> I have an IP-27 that I built in 1972 and It does not work. I would
> first suspect the capacitors and then the PNP devices. I am getting
> close to starting to fix mine.
When you do, please keep us informed.
> I don't see any reason to switch to NPN devices as silicon PNP devices
> work just fine and it would make the switch much easier.
Well, any PNP device seems to be much more expensive than NPN devices
with similar or equivalent characteristics. I think PNP devices have been
being slowly phased out over the past 10 years or more.
> Silicon has
> a higher base-emitter voltage drop
On the other hand, Ge PNP devices have, generally, a much higher Veb
than Si devices: 20 V in the case of the 2N2553 vs 2 v in the case of its Si
equivalent. At least the Si equivalents I have found so far do.
> so that might cause some problems
> in the Q1 and Q2 circuits
Yes. Exactly
> and also the higher frequency response of
> the newer silicon devices may cause some oscillations that have to be
> snubbed.
Yes. The 2N2553 has an Ft of 200 KHz. Most Si devices have an Ft up in
the MHz range. This is likely to be a significant problem.
> Just looked through my parts drawers and I have most of the original
> transistors except for Q1.
Q-1 is somewhat weird: it is a DTG-600, and there appears to be no direct
sub for that. Its Ft was quite high for the time, something like 500 KHz. An
NTE-179 is SUPPOSED to be a sub, but I wouldn't trust that.
Also, the DTG-600 has a Pd of 106 watts.
Well, it looks as though I have more research to do.
Thanks for your input.
vy 73,
Ken W7EKB
More information about the Heath
mailing list