<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Coool....now, does anyone have an SB-104 schematic handy so that a
comparison could be made? I'm betting that Pete's 303 blanker is
unique to the 303'...and now the big question remains, why didn't
they develop this on the 303'? I know the answer to one question
though....The question, is why does a 303' have an rf attenuator in
the first place? It's kind of stupid, and it doesn't do anything
that an rf gain control can't already do. Soooo, I bet this "rf
attenuator' was the cheap answer to "What do we fill that spot
with?" that the engineers had to answer when they couldn't get the
noise blanker to work. At least, that's my theory...<br>
<br>
Guy, <br>
WA6OQQ<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/15/2014 2:30 PM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pbrickey@verizon.net">pbrickey@verizon.net</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:17476427.886895.1394919053664.JavaMail.root@vznit170146"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I have had quite a few questions about this, so I thought I would send out the schematic that is in my SB-303 manual.
It is attached.
73's,
Peter
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Heath mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Heath@puck.nether.net">Heath@puck.nether.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/heath</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<img src="cid:part1.02030204.04040104@js-net.com" border="0"></div>
</body>
</html>