[iptv-users] STB/video stream monitoring

Kevin Shymkiw kshymkiw at gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 13:14:17 EDT 2009


I have used Ineoquest, and would have to recomend Mixed Signals over 
Ineoquest (http://mixedsignals.com/index.php).  Ineoquest is still 
looking more into the Transport Layer, rather than the MPEG itself.  
Mixed Signals and Symmetricom are heavily into the MPEG encoding, 
etc...  We have a large scale deployment of Ineoquest and Mixed Signals, 
when I say large scale I mean >$2million, and by far the Mixed Signals 
product out performs Ineoquest.

Kevin

Alex Moen wrote:
> Take a look at Ineoquest's iVMS (for transport quality monitoring) and 
> iCMS (for video/audio content quality and end-user experience 
> monitoring).  We use both of these products, and they can be both a 
> lifesaver and a "finger-pointing" resolver.
>
> http://www.ineoquest.com
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> Is anyone doing any video stream error monitoring/checking from the
>> point-of-view of the STB?  I know that there is at least one vendor out
>> there, Psytechnics, that has a module it can integrate into the 
>> middleware
>> of the STB, but I haven't see IPTV middleware vendors picking that 
>> up.  I
>> know that the Amino 110 writes out some rudimentary stats to the drive.
>>
>> We track most of our video problems based on the 15-minute PM bins 
>> that our
>> transport gear's ADSL ports record, but nothing L4 and up.
>>
>> Ideally every STB would have something Psytechnic-like built in.
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> iptv-users mailing list
>> iptv-users at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/iptv-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> iptv-users mailing list
> iptv-users at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/iptv-users
>


More information about the iptv-users mailing list