[j-nsp] VRRP

[Guy Davies]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Michael,

I don't have a copy of the book, but if I read your question right, you're
suggesting that a router has a peering session with two boxes, which happen
to have VRRP configured.  Whatever happens, I wouldn't peer with the VRRP
address.  I'd peer with the interface address (for eBGP) or the loopback
(for iBGP).  Therefore, the VRRP address is irrelevant to any BGP session.

VRRP is really only there to give some resilience to devices, which don't
support IP routing and only support a default gateway.

Regards,

Guy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael [mailto:wsf at vodatelsys.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:59 AM
> To: Todd Regonini
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VRRP
> 
> 
> Hi Todd,
> 
> Thanks. could you pls check with the book of JNCIP-M on page 493
> abt. P1 EBGP Peering. after reading, culd you pls confirm me if 
> both R1 and R2 need to "accept data", after R1 fail, will R2 become
> master and has BGP peer with P1 without "accept data"?
> 
> -- 
> Michael <wsf at vodatelsys.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0

iQA/AwUBPpEy2o3dwu/Ss2PCEQK7zACgpNbbxM78a+20d/XesFvPucxxraEAoPjH
dlHuuvffvOqD15J0l6V4UfKP
=IPFB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----