[j-nsp] Dcd complains about duplicate IPv6 link-local address

Josef Buchsteiner josefb at juniper.net
Mon Jan 13 09:11:23 EST 2003


Matti,
         this is just a warning and will not cause you
any troubles. In version 5.5 and higher we don't send
such warnings in this case as the link-local address
will be the same for all logical links for one atm-interface.


thanks
Josef


At 08:48 AM 1/13/2003, Matti Saarinen wrote:


>Hello,
>
>I've notice our M10 (running 5.4R3.2) generating the following log
>entries (line wrapped):
>
>dcd[535]: Warning: identical local address is found on route instance,
>intf: at-0/0/0.200, family type: inet6
>
>
>When I look at the interface addresses I see the following:
>
>at-0/0/0.96     up    up   inet6 2001:708:310:722::2/64
>                                  fe80::2a0:a5ff:fe12:6601/64
>at-0/0/0.200    up    up   inet6 2001:708:310:723::2/64
>                                  fe80::2a0:a5ff:fe12:6601/64
>lo0.0           up    up   inet6 2001:708:310:100::2 --> ::/0
>                                  fe80::2a0:a5ff:fe12:6601--> ::/0
>
>
>As it can be seen all the interfaces have identical link-local
>addresses.
>
>The relevant configuration of the ATM interface looks like this:
>
>
>unit 96 {
>     encapsulation atm-snap;
>     vci 0.96;
>     inverse-arp;
>     family iso;
>     family inet6 {
>         address 2001:708:310:722::2/64;
>     }
>}
>
>unit 200 {
>     encapsulation atm-snap;
>     vci 0.200;
>     inverse-arp;
>     family iso;
>     family inet6 {
>         address 2001:708:310:723::2/64;
>     }
>}
>
>
>
>Is the log message only informational? Could there be some problems
>waiting to turn up later and the cause would be this one? I couldn't
>find anything special with Google so I decided to ask here, too.
>
>
>--
>- Matti -
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list