[j-nsp] BGP origination

[Richard A Steenbergen]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:31:03AM -0800, Clayton Fiske wrote:
> 
> Doesn't this method require a statement per (aggregate) prefix as well?

A route per route is a lot better than a policy-statement term per route.

I'm sorry if I'm the only person on the planet who tries to make the 
configs as clean as possible, but it seems like such a loss to have the 
very nice functionality of being able to directly attach community tags, 
as paths, etc, to a route, and then not be able to use that functionality.

I suppose what I'm really thinking about is something along the lines of a 
prefix-list which lets you specify all those per-route options, or some 
other way to get those routes with options into the system without having 
to make them "actual" routes which compete against other routes for their 
existance.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)