[j-nsp] auto-export vs rib-groups

Chris Hellberg Chris.Hellberg at telecom.co.nz
Thu Nov 6 03:07:39 EST 2003


R.N.,

Using auto-export is a lot more flexible than rib-groups both from a theoretical and experience point-of-view; rib-groups bring pain.

It's also easier to explain to others how the coupling between auto-export and policies work rather than try and explain how rib-groups import and export routes between VRFs (the configuration also changes depending on the protocol the route has been learned from).

Chris

Just an addendum, if you've got any IPVPN policies that once used a match on protocol bgp as well as a community, you'll need to remove that for routes you wish to import that are imported from the same node.


-----Original Message-----
From:	MPLS Newbie [mailto:routernewbie at hotmail.com]
Sent:	Thu 11/6/2003 6:56 PM
To:	juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Cc:	
Subject:	[j-nsp] auto-export vs rib-groups
Dear List,

   Can someone comment based on operational experience or router-geeking 
experience regarding to using the knob of auto-export to exchange routes 
among vrf's vs using rib-groups to achieve the same?

any pro's or con's?

Much appreciated.

Router Newbie

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays!  Snappier product search... 
http://shopping.msn.com

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read
it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not
copy or use any part of this communication or disclose
anything about it. Thank you."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list